ReviewBJR open2025
Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal radiology: practical aspects and latest perspectives.
Review in BJR open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for postoperative plain radiographic assessment after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current evidence, clinical readiness, and limitations.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Fracture Detection on Bone Radiographs: The Impact of an AI Tool on Orthopaedic Night Shifts.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging was among the first radiology subspecialties to adopt artificial intelligence (AI), with applications now spanning the entire MSK workflow, from image acquisition to reporting. Deep learning-based reconstruction protocols can accelerate MRI by reducing scan times and artefacts, improving accessibility in high-volume and resource-limited settings. Furthermore, AI interpretation tools have demonstrated strong performance in fracture detection, assessment of meniscal and ligament tears, bone tumour characterization and automated quantification of measurements, supporting greater diagnostic consistency across radiologists with varying experience levels. Large language models (LLMs) extend AI's impact beyond image analysis by simplifying reports for patients, automating classification systems, and streamlining clinical communication. Despite these advances, important challenges remain. Integration of AI into already established clinical workflows can be complex, and requires robust technical solutions, regulatory compliance, and strategies to maintain radiologist oversight. Questions of liability, cost-effectiveness, and the role of AI in medical education further underscore the need for careful implementation. AI is poised to fundamentally reshape MSK radiology by enhancing efficiency, improving diagnostic accuracy, and enabling more patient-centred communication. To fully realize this potential, adoption must balance innovation with safety, equity, and sustainability, ensuring AI remains a trusted assistive tool that strengthens rather than replaces radiologist expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.