ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Effects of nicotinamide riboside on NAD+ levels, cognition, and symptom recovery in long-COVID: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04809974 (Randomized, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Clinical Trial of Nicotinamide Riboside to Evaluate NAD+ Levels in Individuals With Persistent Cognitive and Physical Symptoms After COVID-19 Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Clinical Trial of Nicotinamide Riboside to Evaluate NAD+ Levels in Individuals With Persistent Cognitive and Physical Symptoms After COVID-19 Illness ("Long-COVID")
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunometabolic reprogramming in multiple sclerosis: from pathogenic amplifier to therapeutic target in neuroinflammation and remyelination.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- NAD⁺ biology and supplementation: From mechanisms to clinical perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Molecular Mechanisms of Accelerated Ageing in Geriatric Depression: Interplay of Telomere Attrition, Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Cellular Senescence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Case Report: Mitochondrial insufficiency underlies cholinergic failure in post-vaccination long COVID: a candidate treatment protocol.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Long-COVID often involves cognitive difficulties, immune dysregulation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Studies suggest nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) precursors like nicotinamide riboside (NR) may reduce inflammation and support mitochondrial and neurological function. This double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled clinical trial with a placebo lead-in phase evaluated the effects of NR (2000 mg/day) on NAD+ and changes in cognitive and long-COVID symptoms. Methods: This was a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a single center in Boston, USA, between August 2021 and September 2023. 58 community-dwelling participants with long-COVID were randomized 2:1 to the NR-NR group (NR for 20 weeks) or the PBO-NR group (PBO for 10 weeks, followed by NR for 10 weeks). The primary outcome was cognition, assessed using the Everyday Cognition scale (ECog), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), and Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B). Secondary outcomes included the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. We conducted a mixed model for repeated measures to compare groups, then post-hoc and unadjusted for multiplicity, combined both groups to explore changes from baseline after 10 weeks of NR. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04809974) in 2021. Findings: 37 participants (64%) were assigned to NR-NR, and 21 participants (36%) to PBO-NR. There was a 32.4% and 51.4% dropout in the NR-NR group at 10 weeks and 20 weeks, respectively, vs. 14.3% dropout at each timepoint in the PBO-NR group. In the NR-NR group, NAD+ levels increased by 2.6- to 3.1-fold after 5-10 weeks of supplementation, respectively, and remained elevated at 20 weeks. In the PBO-NR group, NAD+ levels remained close to baseline (0.93- to 1.0-fold change, 95% CI: 0.5-1.4) during the initial 5 and 10 weeks of PBO. After switching to NR, levels rose to a 2.6-fold and 2.1-fold increase after 5 and 10 weeks of NR, respectively. No significant between-group differences were observed for cognitive outcomes (ECog, RBANS, TMT-B; p-values = 0.47-0.74). There were no significant differences in fatigue severity (p = 0.59), sleep quality p = 0.69), and symptoms of anxiety (p = 0.84) or depression (p = 0.20) between PBO and NR groups. In post-hoc exploratory analysis, examining within-group changes during 5 and 10 weeks of NR intake by grouping all participants during the first 10 weeks of the NR phase, there were significant differences from baseline after 10 weeks of NR in executive functioning, fatigue severity, sleep quality, and symptoms of depression (compared with no significant changes in TMT-B, FSS, PSQI, BAI, or BDI scores during the PBO phase). One serious adverse event was reported, deemed unrelated to the study drug or trial. Interpretation: In long-COVID, NR increased NAD+ within 5 weeks but did not significantly improve cognition, fatigue, sleep, or mood vs. PBO. Exploratory analyses suggested within-group benefits after 10 weeks of NR, supporting the need for larger trials. Funding: This work was supported by Niagen Bioscience, the MGH McCance Center for Brain Health, Lavine Brain Health Innovation Fund, MGH ECOR CDI Physician-Scientist Development Award, and the Alzheimer's Association (grant no. AARGD-23-114103).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.