Evidence mapPaperPMID 41357333Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Effects of nicotinamide riboside on NAD+ levels, cognition, and symptom recovery in long-COVID: a randomized controlled trial.

Chao-Yi Wu, William Cody Reynolds, Isabel Abril, Alison J McManus, Charles Brenner, Gabriel González-Irizarry, Leidys Gutiérrez-Martínez, Olivia Sun, Jonathan Rosand, Rudolph E Tanzi and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04809974 (Randomized, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Clinical Trial of Nicotinamide Riboside to Evaluate NAD+ Levels in Individuals With Persistent Cognitive and Physical Symptoms After COVID-19 Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04809974 phase4completednot on this map

Randomized, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Clinical Trial of Nicotinamide Riboside to Evaluate NAD+ Levels in Individuals With Persistent Cognitive and Physical Symptoms After COVID-19 Illness ("Long-COVID")

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsCovid19, Sequelae of, Infection, Cognitive SymptomArmsNiagen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chao-Yi WuDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
William Cody ReynoldsDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Isabel AbrilDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Alison J McManusDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Charles BrennerDepartment of Diabetes & Cancer Metabolism, City of Hope, CA, USA.
Gabriel González-IrizarryDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Leidys Gutiérrez-MartínezDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Olivia SunDepartment of Diabetes & Cancer Metabolism, City of Hope, CA, USA.
Jonathan RosandHenry and Allison McCance Center for Brain Health, MGH, MA, USA.
Rudolph E TanziHenry and Allison McCance Center for Brain Health, MGH, MA, USA.
Steven E ArnoldDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Edmarie Guzmán-VélezHenry and Allison McCance Center for Brain Health, MGH, MA, USA.

Funding

Research EducationP30AG062421 · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · 2025 to 2025
$4.8M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Long-COVID often involves cognitive difficulties, immune dysregulation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Studies suggest nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) precursors like nicotinamide riboside (NR) may reduce inflammation and support mitochondrial and neurological function. This double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled clinical trial with a placebo lead-in phase evaluated the effects of NR (2000 mg/day) on NAD+ and changes in cognitive and long-COVID symptoms. Methods: This was a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a single center in Boston, USA, between August 2021 and September 2023. 58 community-dwelling participants with long-COVID were randomized 2:1 to the NR-NR group (NR for 20 weeks) or the PBO-NR group (PBO for 10 weeks, followed by NR for 10 weeks). The primary outcome was cognition, assessed using the Everyday Cognition scale (ECog), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), and Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B). Secondary outcomes included the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. We conducted a mixed model for repeated measures to compare groups, then post-hoc and unadjusted for multiplicity, combined both groups to explore changes from baseline after 10 weeks of NR. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04809974) in 2021. Findings: 37 participants (64%) were assigned to NR-NR, and 21 participants (36%) to PBO-NR. There was a 32.4% and 51.4% dropout in the NR-NR group at 10 weeks and 20 weeks, respectively, vs. 14.3% dropout at each timepoint in the PBO-NR group. In the NR-NR group, NAD+ levels increased by 2.6- to 3.1-fold after 5-10 weeks of supplementation, respectively, and remained elevated at 20 weeks. In the PBO-NR group, NAD+ levels remained close to baseline (0.93- to 1.0-fold change, 95% CI: 0.5-1.4) during the initial 5 and 10 weeks of PBO. After switching to NR, levels rose to a 2.6-fold and 2.1-fold increase after 5 and 10 weeks of NR, respectively. No significant between-group differences were observed for cognitive outcomes (ECog, RBANS, TMT-B; p-values = 0.47-0.74). There were no significant differences in fatigue severity (p = 0.59), sleep quality p = 0.69), and symptoms of anxiety (p = 0.84) or depression (p = 0.20) between PBO and NR groups. In post-hoc exploratory analysis, examining within-group changes during 5 and 10 weeks of NR intake by grouping all participants during the first 10 weeks of the NR phase, there were significant differences from baseline after 10 weeks of NR in executive functioning, fatigue severity, sleep quality, and symptoms of depression (compared with no significant changes in TMT-B, FSS, PSQI, BAI, or BDI scores during the PBO phase). One serious adverse event was reported, deemed unrelated to the study drug or trial. Interpretation: In long-COVID, NR increased NAD+ within 5 weeks but did not significantly improve cognition, fatigue, sleep, or mood vs. PBO. Exploratory analyses suggested within-group benefits after 10 weeks of NR, supporting the need for larger trials. Funding: This work was supported by Niagen Bioscience, the MGH McCance Center for Brain Health, Lavine Brain Health Innovation Fund, MGH ECOR CDI Physician-Scientist Development Award, and the Alzheimer's Association (grant no. AARGD-23-114103).

Indexed as

DepressionFatigueNicotinamide adenine dinucleotidePASCSARS-CoV-2Sleep

Identifiers

PMID41357333
PMCPMC12675013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.