ArticleWorld journal of transplantation2025
Expanding boundaries: The evolution and future of living donor kidney transplantation.
Article in World journal of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) has evolved into a globally adopted clinical practice, driven by improvements in donor selection, immunological compatibility, and perioperative care. These advances have contributed to enhanced donor safety and improved early graft outcomes. Still, its uptake remains limited worldwide, influenced by differences in clinical infrastructure, surgical expertise, and programmatic priorities. A central procedural consideration in LDKT is the choice of kidney for procurement, right or left. Left donor nephrectomy is generally preferred due to favorable vascular anatomy, yet right-sided procurement is often necessary in the presence of anatomical variations. While some studies report higher rates of early complications with right-sided nephrectomy, including delayed graft function and early graft loss, long-term outcomes appear comparable. The evaluation of laterality, however, varies significantly across centers and is often shaped more by institutional practice than by comparative evidence. In this editorial, we review key clinical and technical advances that have improved the safety and outcomes of LDKT, including immunological matching, donor selection, perioperative strategies, and early graft performance. We then critically examine the role of kidney laterality in donor nephrectomy, highlighting how anatomical complexity and procedural risk continue to shape clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.