ReviewFrontiers in radiology2025
Complications of tunneled central venous catheter placement: a narrative review of risks, prevention, and management strategies.
Review in Frontiers in radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tunneled cuffed catheter (TCC) remains a crucial vascular access option for patients undergoing hemodialysis, particularly in those who are not candidates for arteriovenous fistulas or grafts. However, placement carries immediate and delayed complications. Objective: This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the complications encountered during and after the placement of a TCC for hemodialysis, highlighting current evidence, risk factors, prevention strategies, and management approaches. Methods: A critical selection of relevant literature was performed through PubMed and Scopus databases, focusing on articles published in the last two decades. Particular attention was given to studies reporting on mechanical, infectious, thrombotic, and late-onset complications, as well as technical factors influencing outcomes. Results: Complications of TCCs can be classified as immediate (e.g., arterial puncture, pneumothorax, bleeding), early (e.g., catheter malposition, exit-site infections), and late (e.g., central venous stenosis, catheter-related bloodstream infections, thrombosis). Patient- and procedure-related factors increase risk. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy, strict sterility, and timely management reduce complications rates. Conclusion: TCCs are indispensable in selected patients, but understanding their complications is key to patient safety and outcomes. Optimal outcomes depend on accurate patient selection, operator expertise, and standardized post-placement care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.