Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357807›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Adverse events and predictive probability of peripheral vasopressor administration in pediatric shock: integrating frequentist and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analyses.

Mario Martinez-Solarte, Jaime Fernández-Sarmiento, Lucía Guzman, Daniel Fernández-Sarta, Lina Gutiérrez-Montenegro, Ana María Sarmiento-Moreno, Hernando Mulett, Maria Carolina Fernández-Palacio, Juan David Suárez, Jonathan Mejía and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mario Martinez-Solarte *Department of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jaime Fernández-Sarmiento *Department of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Lucía GuzmanDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Daniel Fernández-SartaDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Lina Gutiérrez-MontenegroDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ana María Sarmiento-MorenoDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Hernando MulettDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Maria Carolina Fernández-PalacioDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan David SuárezDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jonathan MejíaDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Raul Copana-OlmosDepartment of Pediatric and Critical Care, Hospital del Niño Manuel Ascencio Villarroel, Department of IIBISMED, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Nils CassonDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Hospital de La Misericordia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Diana BravoDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Hospital de La Misericordia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Anhi MartinezDepartment of Pharmacy, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Daniela GuayambucoDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Mariana RíosDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Tejas Girishkumar MehtaDepartment of Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Javier UrbanoDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Maternal and Child Public Health Department, School of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pediatric shock demands early vasoactive therapy to restore perfusion. When central access is delayed-particularly in resource-limited settings-peripheral vasopressors provide a feasible alternative. This systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis synthesized current evidence on peripheral vasopressor use in children, estimating incidence, characteristics, and probabilistic risk of local complications to inform safe clinical practice. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library (January 1990-March 2025) using MeSH and free-text terms for vasoactive agents, peripheral intravenous access, pediatric populations, and adverse events. Studies including children aged 1 month-18 years who received peripheral vasopressors and reported local complications were eligible. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. The primary outcome was the pooled proportion of local adverse events. Frequentist and hierarchical Bayesian logistic models estimated pooled rates, 95% confidence or credible intervals, and predictive uncertainty. Weakly informative priors {half-Cauchy for random effects, normal [(0,1)] for log-odds} were applied, and posterior estimates derived via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (four chains, 2,000 iterations, Results: Eleven studies comprising 1,575 pediatric patients were included. The pooled incidence of local adverse events was 1.97% (95% CI, 1.41-2.82) with no severe complications such as necrosis, ischemia, or need for surgery. The Bayesian model yielded a consistent pooled rate of 1.8% (CrI95%, 1.0-2.8), with a 68% probability of being below 2% and 99% below 3%. Predictive intervals suggested new studies of 100-300 patients would show rates between 0% and 5%, confirming reproducibility. Subgroup analyses revealed no meaningful differences by setting or catecholamine type. Most events were mild extravasations after a median infusion of 4.1 h (IQR, 2.9-7.1). Conclusions: Peripheral vasopressor administration in pediatric shock is associated with a very low incidence of local adverse events. The Bayesian hierarchical model confirmed these findings with high probabilistic confidence, supporting peripheral administration as a safe and rapid approach for early hemodynamic stabilization. Peripheral vasopressors may be used for short durations (typically <4 h, according to the included studies) while central access is being established, thereby minimizing delays in critical resuscitation. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251115788, identifier CRD420251115788.

Indexed as

Bayesian analysiscatheterizationinfusionsshockvasoactive agents

Identifiers

PMID41357807
PMCPMC12678326

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.