Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357888›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Antiretroviral therapy and associated drug interactions with cardiovascular drugs: a critical review.

Marios Spanakis, Konstantinos Alexakis, Petros Ioannou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marios Spanakis *Division of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Konstantinos Alexakis *German Medical Institute, Limassol, Cyprus.
Petros IoannouDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significant progress in HIV research has led to the development of innovative medicines and protocols. Most people living with HIV (PLWH) achieve longer lifespans when adhering strictly to the therapeutic protocols. A notable characteristic of PLWH is a higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases. This may result from the disease itself or increased life expectancy. Regardless of the underlying cause, it often requires the concurrent use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) medications. In such cases, a key issue regarding optimal evidence-based practices is the management of potential and clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Over time, our understanding of DDIs has advanced significantly. These advancements have led to the development of tools and approaches for identifying and managing DDIs, especially in special population groups such as PLWH. Clinically, recognizing and managing these interactions is key to preventing adverse effects and optimizing outcomes in PLWH, thereby enhancing patient safety and quality of care. This review discusses the latest data on DDIs between ART and CVD medications, emphasizing their clinical significance. Furthermore, it explores how established tools, such as the Liverpool Drug Interaction Checker and Lexidrug®, can support healthcare professionals. Combined with insights from the literature and summaries of product characteristics, these tools can guide the identification and management of DDIs between ART and CVD medications to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

AIDSantiretroviral treatmentcardiovascular diseasedrug–drug interactionsHIVLexidrug®Liverpool Drug Interaction Checkerpeople living with HIV

Identifiers

PMID41357888
PMCPMC12678287

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.