Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357937›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of psychiatry2025

Selecting an appropriate stress model of depression in rodents.

Xiao-Xue Lu, Hao Tang, Xu-Hao Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiao-Xue LuSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong Province, China.
Hao TangSchool of Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Jinan 250014, Shandong Province, China.
Xu-Hao LiSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong Province, China. l1xuhao2022@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the well-established functions of neurotransmitters and their receptors in depression studies, the aetiology of depression remains unknown. Further research into the field of animal studies is required in order to facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the development of depression. While the potential of animal behaviour to elucidate the molecular underpinnings of depression remains to be elucidated, the establishment of animal models can facilitate the identification of analogous pathogenic pathways through the application of rigorous methodologies. Animal models that are suitable for simulating the illness state of human depression can be utilised to investigate the pathophysiology of depression and the development of novel antidepressant medications. Currently, there is an absence of an optimal animal model that can fully replicate the pathogenic pathways of human depression, which limits future research in this field. It is evident that stress constitutes the primary catalyst for the onset of depressive states, a phenomenon that has been observed in both human and animal subjects. From this standpoint, animal models of stress-induced depression should be better equipped to simulate the onset process of human depression. This study offers a comprehensive summary and analysis of the most frequently employed rodent models of depression, with a view to providing a more diverse range of models and resources for animal studies in the field of depression research.

Indexed as

Animal model of depressionDepressionRodent animals modelStress modelStressor

Identifiers

PMID41357937
PMCPMC12679136

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.