ReviewFrontiers in toxicology2025
Overall effects of microplastics on brain.
Review in Frontiers in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micro- and nanoplastics-induced neurotoxicity: a CNS-centered, evidence-graded adverse outcome pathway framework based on systematic weight-of-evidence assessment.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- Microplastics and Nanoplastics in the Human Diet: Sources of Exposure, Bioavailability, Toxicokinetics, and Systemic Health Effects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microplastic-induced neurotoxicity in Zebrafish: Current evidence and underlying mechanisms.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Taurine Mitigates Microplastic-Induced Neurotoxicity Through Modulation of Neurobehavior, Neurotransmitters, Oxidative Stress, and AKT-1/CREB-1/BDNF Signaling in Mice.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Micro- and nanoplastic exposure as an emerging risk factor for depressive-like phenotypes across species: a systematic review.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Micro- and nanoplastics as environmental modifiers of neuroimmune dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastic (MP) and nanoplastic (NP) pollution represents a pervasive environmental issue, raising significant concerns regarding potential neurotoxicity and impacts on brain health. This review synthesizes recent research findings to provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of MPs/NPs on the brain. Evidence demonstrates that MPs/NPs can cross critical biological barriers, including the blood-brain barrier and the placenta, gaining access to the central nervous system (CNS) and the developing fetal brain, influenced by particle size, charge, and the biomolecular corona. Once present, MPs/NPs trigger multiple detrimental pathways, including oxidative stress, persistent neuroinflammation involving microglia and astrocytes, mitochondrial dysfunction leading to energy deficits, disruption of crucial neurotransmitter systems, and direct neuronal damage. Critically, NPs have been shown to promote the aggregation of proteins implicated in neurodegeneration, such as alpha-synuclein. These mechanistic disturbances translate into observable adverse outcomes in experimental models, ranging from cognitive impairments in learning and memory to behavioral abnormalities and pathologies resembling human neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders. Toxicity is modulated by particle characteristics, co-exposures, and host factors like age and sex, with indirect effects via the gut-brain axis also playing a significant role. While current evidence, primarily from animal models often using high doses, strongly indicates a neurotoxic potential, significant research gaps remain concerning human risk assessment under chronic, low-level environmental exposure conditions and the effects of environmentally aged, mixed-plastic particles. Future research should prioritize human studies, environmentally realistic exposure scenarios, and differentiating direct versus indirect neurotoxic mechanisms to accurately evaluate the threat MPs/NPs pose to human brain health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.