ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Rethinking 15-min walkable neighborhoods for healthy aging: evidence from cardiovascular health in Shanghai's older adults.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interventions targeting chronic diseases through urban built environments have gained increasing attention due to their potential population-level health benefits. However, empirical evidence on the relationship between built environment features and cardiovascular health among older adults remains limited, particularly in ultradense Asian cities experiencing rapid population aging. This study analyzed fine-scale built environment data to delineate 15-min walkable neighborhoods around 2,579 stroke emergency visits among adults aged 60 to 80 in Shanghai. Participants were classified as survivors or non-survivors based on outcomes during their initial hospitalization, serving as a proxy for cardiovascular health status. Using binary logistic regression, we examined associations between neighborhood environmental characteristics and cardiovascular outcomes. Results indicated that higher residential building density and proximity to major roads were significantly linked to poorer cardiovascular health, whereas greater neighborhood greenness, measured by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), was associated with better outcomes, especially within socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Streetscape features such as visible sky and greenery were positively correlated with better cardiovascular health in more affluent areas. Additionally, a U-shaped relationship emerged between the proportion of residential land use and cardiovascular outcomes in disadvantaged communities. These findings provide nuanced, context-specific insights into how fine-scale built environment factors relate to cardiovascular health among aging urban populations, offering valuable implications for land use planning and healthy urban design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.