ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A comparative analysis of non-communicable disease risk among adolescents aged 12 to 18 in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, with regard to sex, school quintiles, and perceived stress.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are a growing concern in low- and middle-income countries, especially among adolescents. Recent data indicate a rise in NCD cases within this group. Despite the increasing prevalence of NCD risk factors, limited research has explored the relationship between perceived stress and NCDs. Study aim: To compare adolescents aged 12 to 18 years who are at risk for NCDs with those who are not at risk, considering sex, school quintiles, and perceived stress. Settings: The study involved 266 adolescents selected through stratified random sampling from seven schools in two Eastern Cape districts. Methods: It assessed anthropometric and physiological measurements and perceived stress levels. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data, while independent samples t-tests analyses were employed to compare groups. Logistic regression was utilized to predict probability. Results: Most physical and physiological assessments were normal, except for females' elevated BMI (24.52 ± 6.11), classifying them as overweight. Perceived stress did not differ significantly between at-risk and not-at-risk adolescents, although at-risk females reported higher stress levels than males. Perceived stress was consistently higher among adolescents from Quintiles 4-5 schools across both at-risk and not-at-risk groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that sex was the significant predictor of NCD risk, with females being four times more likely to develop NCD risk factors than males, whereas school quintile was not a significant predictor. Conclusion: The study highlights a greater risk of NCD development among female adolescents, who also experience elevated levels of perceived stress. Recommendations to address these findings include specific strategies that reduce this population's risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.