ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Development and interpretation of a machine learning model for predicting body mass index in Chinese adolescents: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obesity Interpreter: A Digital Tool for Assessment of Childhood Obesity.Indian pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purposes: This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict body mass index (BMI) in adolescents based on readily accessible daily information and to investigate the influence of modifiable factors on BMI changes through model interpretation techniques. Methods: This study is a one-year prospective cohort study. Baseline data were collected through anthropometric measurements and questionnaires, and BMI were reassessed after 1 year. Six machine learning models were developed to predict BMI. Nested cross-validation (CV) was used for hyperparameter tuning and performance estimation. Predictors were prescreened on the inner-training folds of the nested CV using univariable analyses. Model performance was evaluated using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R Results: The mean BMI of the 1,827 students included in the final analysis increased from 21.18 ± 3.63 kg/m Conclusion: This study developed a BMI prediction model for adolescents using readily accessible daily information. The model accurately predicts BMI values 1 year later and provides both population-level and individual-level interpretability. Compared to existing studies, it offers key advantages, including independence from complex clinical data, the ability to predict continuous BMI values, and strong model interpretability. Our findings provide a promising research tool for screening high-risk adolescents, informing public health prevention and intervention strategies, and supporting personalized clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.