Evidence mapPaperPMID 41358244Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Factors influencing healthcare professionals' rating on quality of death and dying: a nationwide cross-sectional study in China.

Mingming Cheng, Yaxin Lan, Yongyi Chen, Fei Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingming Cheng *Department of Social Work, School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Yaxin Lan *Department of Social Work, School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Yongyi ChenHunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Fei FangDepartment of Sociology, School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding healthcare professionals' perspectives on the quality of death and dying is essential for improving palliative care in China, especially as hospice and palliative services expand. This study examined how Chinese healthcare professionals' assessments of death and dying quality vary by institutional setting, sociodemographic factors, professional background, and training experience. A cross-sectional design was conducted. Between November 2023 and January 2024, 2,465 healthcare professionals engaged in palliative and hospice care (including doctors, nurses, and social workers) participated in the survey. Multivariate linear regression models and propensity score matching were used to identify factors associated with Quality of Death and Dying Index ratings. Higher ratings on the Index were observed among respondents working in institutions with multidisciplinary end-of-life care teams, those who were female, born in the 1970s, held a bachelor's degree, had longer years of service, cared for patients with a survival period of three to six months, and participated in palliative care training programs. These findings suggest that institutional collaboration, professional experience, and targeted training are closely linked to more favorable perceptions of death and dying quality among healthcare workers. Enhancing multidisciplinary coordination and ensuring equitable access to training opportunities may help improve end-of-life care quality within healthcare institutions. The results provide evidence-based insights into the determinants of death and dying quality in China, offering practical guidance for strengthening palliative and hospice care development in rapidly aging societies where end-of-life service systems are still evolving.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to DeathHealth PersonnelPalliative CareQuality of Health CareTerminal CareAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospice CareHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescross-sectional studyeducationhealthcare professionalshospicepalliative carequality of death

Identifiers

PMID41358244
PMCPMC12677404

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.