Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358934›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Exploring a Digital Health Solution to Collect and Manage Health-Related Needs for Patients Who Undergo Complex Surgery: Mixed Methods Study.

Naleef Fareed, Humza Asgher, Diamantis Tsilimigras, Odysseas P Chatzipanagiotou, Giovanni Catalano, Bridget Hartwell, Kathleen Bolton, Timothy M Pawlik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naleef FareedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 370 West 9th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, United States, 1 614 366 0283.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8764-1625
Humza AsgherDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 370 West 9th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, United States, 1 614 366 0283.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8270-4090
Diamantis TsilimigrasDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3676-9263
Odysseas P ChatzipanagiotouDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8377-0263
Giovanni CatalanoDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1440-7031
Bridget HartwellJames Surgical Oncology Department, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1648-2285
Kathleen BoltonJames Surgical Oncology Department, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6400-3921
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-9870

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS028822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients who undergo complex surgery (eg, esophagectomy and liver resection) often experience a substantial burden of health-related needs (medical, social, and behavioral health). A digital solution could facilitate the collection and resolution of health-related needs by care team members for these patients. A digital solution may facilitate adherence to a clear treatment plan and concomitantly reduce surgical complications and readmissions. Objective: The aim of the study is to establish gaps in the collection and management of health-related needs and identify a set of user specifications for a digital solution to collect and resolve health-related needs for patients who undergo complex surgery. Methods: We applied the double diamond framework and organized the study into two sequential phases: (1) qualitative methods to discover the perspectives of patients and care team members on health-related needs and (2) participatory design sessions to gain feedback and sentiment about ideal features of a digital solution. Both phases were conducted between December 2023 and March 2025. We supplemented both phases with analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data for patients who underwent complex surgery at our academic medical center. Results: Extensive themes emerged from interviews with patients (n=20) and care team members (n=24), capturing their health-related and surgical experiences as well as desired features for a digital solution. Our swimlane diagram demonstrated four critical gaps in workflow: (1) heterogeneity in the approach to screening, monitoring, and managing health-related needs; (2) patients felt uncomfortable reporting health-related needs, particularly behavioral and social needs, to their care team; (3) lack of access to referral resources to resolve needs; and (4) the need for a closed-loop intervention for patients and care team members. A subset of participants from phase 1 (n=5 patients and n=9 care team members) provided feedback on preferred features, drawing from digital tools currently available in the EHR at our academic medical center. Among the 3 existing EHR tools tested, there were variations in how patients and care team members felt about their potential use. Participants also provided extensive feedback for preferred components (eg, goals and active plans) that should be available in an existing or custom digital solution to manage health-related needs. Findings from the qualitative interviews and design sessions were corroborated with documentation in the EHR. Conclusions: Digital solutions could provide a streamlined approach for the collection and management of health-related needs in surgery, with the goal of addressing unmet needs and improving patient activation. This approach is critical to ensure that patients, especially patients who undergo complex surgery, have positive health outcomes. We identified preferences for specific features in a proposed digital solution based on our systematic assessment that will inform future work.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandSurgical Procedures, OperativeAdultAgedDigital HealthElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchdigital healthelectronic health record datahealth needssocial needssurgery

Identifiers

PMID41358934
PMCPMC12684001

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.