Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41359667›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

FC-duplex IgG1 (HTLV-1/2): Qualifying the flow cytometry IgG1 duplex assay for differential diagnosis of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infections.

Júlia Pereira Martins, Felipe Araujo Santos, Kelly Alves Bicalho, Jordana Grazziela Alves Coelho-Dos-Reis, Vanessa Peruhype-Magalhães, Maísa Aparecida Ribeiro, Renata Glória Sá, Lucas Pedreira de Carvalho, Antonio Carlos Rosário Vallinoto, Laurence Rodrigues Amaral and 5 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Júlia Pereira MartinsGrupo Integrado de Pesquisas em Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Instituto René Rachou - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) Minas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Felipe Araujo SantosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Imunologia Básica e Aplicada, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Kelly Alves BicalhoGrupo Integrado de Pesquisas em Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Instituto René Rachou - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) Minas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Jordana Grazziela Alves Coelho-Dos-ReisUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vanessa Peruhype-MagalhãesGrupo Integrado de Pesquisas em Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Instituto René Rachou - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) Minas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maísa Aparecida RibeiroFundação Centro de Hematologia e Hemoterapia do Estado de Minas Gerais (HEMOMINAS), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Renata Glória SáServiço de Imunologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Lucas Pedreira de CarvalhoLaboratório de Pesquisas Clínicas (LAPEC), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Antonio Carlos Rosário VallinotoLaboratório de Virologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Laurence Rodrigues AmaralLaboratório de Bioinformática e Análises Moleculares, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Anna Barbara de Freitas Carneiro-ProiettiFundação Centro de Hematologia e Hemoterapia do Estado de Minas Gerais (HEMOMINAS), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Andréa Teixeira-CarvalhoGrupo Integrado de Pesquisas em Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Instituto René Rachou - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) Minas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Allyson Guimarães CostaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Imunologia Básica e Aplicada, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Olindo Assis Martins-FilhoGrupo Integrado de Pesquisas em Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Instituto René Rachou - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) Minas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Márcio Sobreira Silva AraújoGrupo Integrado de Pesquisas em Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Instituto René Rachou - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) Minas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7532-3360

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenadoria de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) infection has been implicated in a broad spectrum of clinical conditions, encompassing both neoplastic and inflammatory-degenerative disorders, associated with relevant immunological dysfunctions. Given the distinct epidemiological profiles and clinical manifestations associated with HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infections, establishing an accurate differential diagnosis is of critical importance. The serological/molecular approaches currently available for differential diagnosis are expensive, time-consuming, and require multiple complementary assays, and still lead to inconclusive results. In this context, the development of a single-platform assay referred to as FC-Duplex IgG1 (HTLV-1/2) assay represented a valuable advance for the differential diagnosis of HTLV infections in clinical settings, while counseling HTLV-seropositive patients and/or conducting seroepidemiological surveys. The present study aimed at qualifying the FC-Duplex IgG1 (HTLV-1/2) kit prototype for differential serodiagnosis of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infections. A biorepository library, composed of serum samples from four HTLV reference centers (HTLV-1(+)/n = 225; HTLV-2(+)/n = 80 and HTLV1/2(-)/n = 55), was tested for anti-HTLV-1 and anti-HTLV-2 IgG1 reactivity using three classification criteria. Discriminant performance analysis supported the high accuracy of FC-Duplex IgG1 (HTLV-1/2) with elevated proportion of correct classification according to PCR & Western Blot reference standards (Criterion 3 = 89%; Criterion 2 = 90% and Criterion 1 = 99%). Decision tree accuracy and Leave One Out Cross-Validation re-enforced the robustness, confirming the minimal overfitting of our findings. Kappa agreement indices further confirmed the substantial to near perfect agreement of FC-Duplex IgG1 (HTLV-1/2) with reference standard methods (Criterion 3 = 0.72; Criterion 2 = 0.75 and Criterion 1 = 0.97). Altogether, these findings qualified the FC-Duplex IgG1 (HTLV-1/2) assay for differential diagnosis of HTLV-1/2 infections.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralFlow CytometryHTLV-I AntibodiesHTLV-II InfectionsHTLV-I InfectionsHuman T-lymphotropic virus 1Human T-lymphotropic virus 2Immunoglobulin GAdultDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsAntibodies, ViralHTLV-I AntibodiesImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID41359667
PMCPMC12714213

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.