Evidence mapPaperPMID 41359794Full record

ReviewClinical science (London, England : 1979)2025

Incretin receptor agonism during pregnancy: implications for mother and baby.

Laura Dearden, Susan E Ozanne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura DeardenUniversity of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-0804-074X
Susan E OzanneUniversity of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-8753-5144

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/17/12/33167Medical Research Council MC_UU_12012/4Medical Research Council MRC_MC_UU_00014/4Rosetrees Trust PGL23/100074Royal Society DHF\R1\221051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity has been described by the WHO as the largest health threat facing mankind. More than 55% of pregnancies in the United Kingdom occur in women who are overweight or living with obesity. Obesity in pregnancy increases the risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a condition that affects one in seven pregnancies globally and is associated with short- and long-term risks for both mother and baby. Therefore, optimising treatment to effectively treat both obesity and GDM in the perinatal period could have wide-ranging benefits for mother and child. Stabilised analogues of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) have revolutionised the treatment of metabolic disease and obesity as they promote weight loss and lower blood glucose. However, the wider action of these analogues, especially in the context of pregnancy, is underexplored. In the United States, the number of young female users of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), such as Ozempic (semaglutide), increased 659% between 2020 and 2023. Ozempic is not currently licensed for use in pregnancy; however, increased semaglutide use in women of reproductive age has resulted in a rise in 'Ozempic babies', when women have unplanned pregnancies while using semaglutide. The potential for GLP1RA use prior to or during pregnancy to limit the transmission of obesity risk between mothers with obesity and their offspring by lowering maternal body weight or correcting maternal glycemia has not been explored. Rodent studies suggest that GLP1RA administration to the dam in pregnancy alters fetal growth, and GLP1RA administration directly to neonates alters development of the hypothalamus. However, recent emerging case reports of human pregnancies where exposure to GLP1RAs has occurred through unplanned pregnancies suggest no harm to the fetus. Given both the potential for GLP1RAs to improve health outcomes in pregnant women with obesity and GDM, and the rapidly rising incidence of fetal exposure, we review the current literature base on the effects of semaglutide use in pregnancy on maternal and offspring health and explore potential broader impacts of use of these agents during the perinatal period based on their known site of action.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsObesityAnimalsFemaleGlucagon-Like Peptide 1HumansIncretinsInfant, NewbornPregnancySemaglutideGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsIncretinsSemaglutidedevelopmental biologyhypothalamusobesitypregnancytype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41359794
PMCPMC12794308

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.