Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41360076›Full record

ArticlePsychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie2025

Intersession Experience Questionnaire Short (IEQ-S): psychometric properties and longitudinal associations with symptoms of an 8-item short version of the Intersession Experience Questionnaire.

Thorsten-Christian Gablonski, Pauline Leonie Herrmann, Mareike Ernst, Lotta Hüwe, Jennifer Kunz, Birgit Senft, Sylke Andreas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thorsten-Christian GablonskiInstitute of Psychology, Alpen-Adria University, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.
Pauline Leonie HerrmannInstitute of Psychology, Alpen-Adria University, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.
Mareike ErnstInstitute of Psychology, Alpen-Adria University, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4952-9717
Lotta HüweInstitute of Psychology, Alpen-Adria University, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.
Jennifer KunzInstitute of Psychology, Alpen-Adria University, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.
Birgit SenftStatistix Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sylke AndreasInstitute of Psychology, Alpen-Adria University, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intersession experiences - thoughts, feelings, and fantasies about therapy or the therapist between sessions - are relevant markers of therapeutic engagement and internalization. However, existing measures like the Intersession Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) are lengthy and difficult to implement in routine care. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a brief, psychometrically sound version of the IEQ that retained the most important dimensions, the Intersession Experience Questionnaire-Short (IEQ-S), to facilitate repeated assessments in clinical and research settings.Based on the German IEQ, eight items with the highest factor loadings across conceptual domains were selected. Cross-sectional data from five clinical samples (N=165) and longitudinal data from another sample of 72 outpatients (2,119 sessions) were used to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the IEQ-S, as well as its sensitivity to within-person change.The IEQ-S items demonstrated strong convergence with the single factors of the full IEQ. It showed expected associations with therapeutic alliance and symptom burden, while demonstrating discriminant validity against general health. Longitudinal analyses revealed meaningful within-person variability and statistically significant associations with depressive symptoms over time (i. e., session by session).The IEQ-S is a reliable, valid, and efficient instrument for capturing intersession experiences. Conclusion: The IEQ-S's brevity and dynamic sensitivity make it well-suited for routine monitoring and ecological momentary assessment. Further research should explore its prognostic utility and applicability across therapy formats.

Indexed as

PsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41360076
PMCPMC12685439

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.