ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025
Adapting global guidelines to local contexts: optimising community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) specific prescribing in Pakistan to counter antimicrobial resistance.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socio-economic impact of antimicrobial resistance in Pakistan: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Comparison between model global AWaRe-based quality indicators and quality indicators developed to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare in South Africa.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Integrating clinical data into evidence-based practice: institutional guideline development for diabetic foot infections.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) imposes a significant health burden among low- and middle-income countries. The burden is exacerbated by antimicrobial resistance (AMR), often due to inappropriate antibiotic agent use and gaps in antimicrobial stewardship activities. This study aimed to explore physicians' perspectives on the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of CAP in Pakistan, with a focus on how international guidelines are interpreted and adapted to local clinical realities.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using semistructured interviews with 33 purposively selected physicians from various specialties, followed by a focus group discussion with 19 of them. Data were analysed through thematic analysis.
resultsFour cross-cutting themes were identified: (1) selective use of diagnostic agents based on severity and access; (2) pragmatic empiric prescribing influenced by resistance trends and antibiotic availability; (3) stewardship intentions constrained by delayed diagnostics and limited infrastructure and (4) underutilisation of preventive strategies including adult vaccinations due to cost and policy gaps. Physicians were aware of Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines but adapted them to local challenges and AMR concerns.
conclusionsMost physicians were unaware of the exact prevalence of causative pathogens and their resistance patterns in Pakistan due to the unavailability of robust local data. Consequently, international guidelines were adapted to local challenges including resistance patterns, limited diagnostics and resource constraints. Physicians prioritised beta-lactam antibiotics use and restricted moxifloxacin and azithromycin to mitigate resistance propagation linked to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant typhoid. Efforts to improve antimicrobial utilisation for CAP in Pakistan need to address implementation barriers and focus on enhancing diagnostic access, vaccine coverage and funding for treatment optimisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.