ArticleNature communications2025
Mammo-AGE: deep learning estimation of breast age from mammograms.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Therapy: Current Advances, Clinical Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological age is an important indicator of organ functions and health. Although mammograms are widely used in breast cancer screening, the potential of mammogram-based biological age predictors remains underexplored. Here, we propose a deep learning model to estimate the biological age of the breast using healthy mammograms. The model is developed on three large datasets and externally validated on two additional datasets, encompassing 95,826 mammograms from 44,497 women aged 18 to 98 years. It demonstrates accurate age estimation (mean absolute error: 4.2 - 6.1 years) with strong correlation to chronological age. Predicted breast age stratifies breast cancer risk similarly to chronological age. Occlusion analysis, employed for model interpretation, reveals the aging-related pattern of the breast. The breast age gap (the difference between system-bias-corrected breast age and chronological age) may reflect breast health status. Breast cancer patients show higher breast age gaps than the healthy population. In two longitudinal datasets, larger breast age gaps are associated with increased future breast cancer risk, with hazard ratios of 1.013 - 1.022. Furthermore, we finetune the model specifically for downstream breast cancer diagnosis and risk prediction. Our approach outperforms other comparative methods, showing its potential for supporting both early detection and personalized screening strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.