ArticleScientific reports2025
Dose‒response relationship between physical activity and all-cause mortality in Chinese adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the bare minimum: the case for revised physical activity guidelines and protein intake recommendations that maximise healthspan.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To determine the dose-response association between physical activity (PA) and all-cause mortality to identify minimum PA thresholds for significant mortality risk reduction by using a nationally representative sample of Chinese adults. This population-based cohort study included 109,407 Chinese participants from the Kailuan study with linkage to national death records up to December 31, 2022. Baseline data were derived from self-reported surveys among participants aged 53.32 ± 13.55 years. During a median follow-up of 6.99 (IQR 5.99–6.99) years, 4571 participants died from all causes. Performing at least 75 min per week of physical activity contributed to significantly reduced all-cause mortality. Compared with physical inactivity, total physical activity was inversely associated with the risk of mortality in the very low (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.98–1.19), low (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81–0.98), medium (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79–0.96) and high (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69–0.85) quartiles. The dose‒response curve revealed a steady decline in HRs with more minutes of physical activity per week with all-cause mortality. Our study demonstrated an inverse nonlinear dose‒response relationship between physical activity and all-cause mortality in elderly adults, with as little as 75 min of weekly activity showing clinically meaningful risk reduction compared with inactivity. These findings suggest that mortality benefits at lower thresholds for elderly adults. The results provide evidence-based justification for health policies that promote graduated physical activity targets to improve population-level adherence among aging communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.