ArticleNPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience2025
Mindbench.ai: an actionable platform to evaluate the profile and performance of large language models in a mental healthcare context.
Article in NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world use of large language models for mental health in 2024.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- AI Chatbot Use and Disclosure for Mental Health Among US Adolescents and Young Adults.JAMA pediatrics · 2026Article
- AI Agents Are Coming: 5-Stage Taxonomy of Language-Based AI Systems for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Counseling.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Safety Mechanisms and Risk Mitigation in Generative AI Mental Health Chatbots: A Systematic Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Expected Competencies and Personal Attributes of Digital Health Navigators to Support Digital Mental Health Care: Focus Group and Interview Study With Patients and Health Care Professionals.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Large language models for psychosocial risk assessment: A multi-method evaluation across suicide, intimate partner violence, and substance misuse.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Risks of Generative AI Mental-Health Chatbots: A Systematic Review and Regulatory Framework.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Psychiatrists' experiences and opinions of generative AI: An exploratory online mixed methods survey in Germany.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals are increasingly utilizing large language model (LLM)-based tools for mental health guidance and crisis support in place of human experts. While AI technology has great potential to improve health outcomes, insufficient empirical evidence exists to suggest that AI technology can be deployed as a clinical replacement; thus, there is an urgent need to assess and regulate such tools. Regulatory efforts have been made and multiple evaluation frameworks have been proposed, however,field-wide assessment metrics have yet to be formally integrated. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive online platform that aggregates evaluation approaches and serves as a dynamic online resource to simplify LLM and LLM-based tool assessment: MindBench.ai. At its core, MindBench.ai is designed to provide easily accessible/interpretable information for diverse stakeholders (patients, clinicians, developers, regulators, etc.). To create MindBench.ai, we built off our work developing MINDapps.org to support informed decision-making around smartphone app use for mental health, and expanded the technical MINDapps.org framework to encompass novel large language model (LLM) functionalities through benchmarking approaches. The MindBench.ai platform is designed as a partnership with the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) to provide assessment tools that systematically evaluate LLMs and LLM-based tools with objective and transparent criteria from a healthcare standpoint, assessing both profile (i.e. technical features, privacy protections, and conversational style) and performance characteristics (i.e. clinical reasoning skills). With infrastructure designed to scale through community and expert contributions, along with adapting to technological advances, this platform establishes a critical foundation for the dynamic, empirical evaluation of LLM-based mental health tools-transforming assessment into a living, continuously evolving resource rather than a static snapshot.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.