ArticleNPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience2025
Automated pipeline for operant behavior phenotyping for high-throughput data management, processing, and visualization.
Article in NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Operant behavior paradigms are essential in preclinical models of neuropsychiatric disorders, such as substance use disorders, enabling the study of complex behaviors including learning, salience, motivation, and preference. These tasks often involve repeated, time-resolved interactions over extended periods, producing large behavioral datasets with rich temporal structure. To support genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the Preclinical Addiction Research Consortium (PARC) has phenotyped over 3000 rats for oxycodone and cocaine addiction-like behaviors using extended access self-administration, producing over 100,000 data files. To manage, store, and process this data efficiently, we leveraged Dropbox, Microsoft Azure Cloud Services, and other widely available computational tools to develop a robust, automated data processing pipeline. Raw MedPC operant output files are automatically converted into structured Excel files using custom scripts, then integrated with standardized experimental, behavioral, and metadata spreadsheets, all uploaded from Dropbox into a relational SQL database on Azure. The pipeline enables automated quality control, data backups, daily summary reports, and interactive visualizations. This approach has dramatically improved PARC's high-throughput phenotyping capabilities by reducing human workload and error, while improving data quality, richness, and accessibility. We here share our approach, as these streamlined workflows can deliver benefits to operant studies of any scale, supporting more efficient, transparent, reproducible, and collaborative preclinical research.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.