ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Beyond who, what, and where: Findings from two experiments on age group differences in narrative elaborateness of autobiographical events.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans can mentally create and elaborately describe events, detailing not just the who, what, and where, but also the connections and intricacies of these elements. Propositional density (proportion of propositions/total words) can be leveraged to assess how elaborately the elements of memories are described. The present experiments used propositional density to investigate how age relates to the elaborateness of orally shared autobiographical event memories. Experiment 1 included 94 young adults (ages 18-26) and 91 older adults (ages 60-95) who completed two narrative tasks, including describing a recent autobiographical event. Experiment 2 was a preregistered experiment that included a larger sample: 110 young adults (ages 18-35) and 161 cognitively normal middle-aged/older adults (ages 50-83) who recalled multiple autobiographical event memories. Propositional density scores were calculated using Computerized Propositional Idea Density Rater (CPIDR 5.1). In Experiment 1's autobiographical event memory task, propositional density was higher in older adults relative to young adults, p < .001, although this effect was driven by younger-old adults (ages 60-71), d = 0.80. Experiment 2, however, did not replicate the results of Experiment 1, instead finding that propositional density was higher in young adults relative to the oldest group of older adults in our sample (ages 69-83), p = .016, d = 0.41. In summary, the present experiments failed to find robust evidence that propositional density is higher in older relative to young adults within autobiographical event memory oral narratives. Rather, autobiographical event memory narrative elaborateness may be in a state of decline by advanced older age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.