Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361220›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Integrating quantile regression with ARIMA and ANN for interpretable and accurate PM2.5 forecasting in Hat Yai, Thailand.

Jularat Chumnaul, Kasikrit Damkliang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jularat ChumnaulDivision of Computational Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand. jularat.c@psu.ac.th.
Kasikrit DamkliangDivision of Computational Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of PM2.5 concentrations is crucial for effective air quality management and the protection of public health. This study proposes a novel hybrid model that integrates Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and quantile regression to enhance forecasting accuracy and robustness. The model is evaluated using daily PM2.5 concentration data from Station 44T in Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand, collected via the Air4Thai platform between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2024. After handling missing values through data cleaning procedures, 1809 observations were retained and split into training (1447 days) and testing (362 days) sets. Several models were developed and evaluated, including a baseline ARIMA(1,1,2), a standalone ANN, and hybrid models integrating ARIMA and ANN, with an additional model incorporating quantile regression. Results showed that, while the ARIMA model demonstrated strong interpretability and the ANN struggled with linear dependencies, the hybrid ARIMA-ANN models showed marked improvements in predictive performance. The proposed ARIMA-ANN-QREG model achieved the best results, with the lowest MAE (1.704), MAPE (11.782%), and minimal bias (MFB = -0.0004), even under extreme PM2.5 conditions. By combining linear, nonlinear, and distributional modeling, the proposed approach offers a computationally efficient yet highly interpretable alternative to deep learning architectures such as ConvLSTM. These findings demonstrate that ARIMA-ANN-QREG is a robust and practical forecasting tool for real-world air quality management, with direct relevance for policy-making and early-warning systems.

Identifiers

PMID41361220
PMCPMC12685952

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.