ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease in the Brazilian population, a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic syndrome and kidney dysfunction: emerging molecular and cellular mechanisms at the metabolic-renal interface.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Mangrove derived coactive bacterial inoculant triggered biochemical traits rejuvenating plant cell function under salt stress.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study to evaluated the associations between the presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), the number of MetS components, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a Brazilian adult population.This was a cross-sectional study using a database of laboratory tests from the National Health Survey, 2014-2015 (n = 8952). MetS was classified based on the presence of three or more of the following components: hyperglycemia, defined by glycosylated hemoglobin ≥ 5.7%; high blood pressure, defined by systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg; abdominal obesity, defined by waist circumference ≥ 90 cm in men and ≥ 80 cm in women; low HDL, defined by HDL cholesterol < 50 mg/dl in women and < 40 mg/dl in men; and hypertriglyceridemia, defined by triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dl. CKD was defined by a glomerular filtration rate ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical variables were evaluated. Analysis of the association between MetS, number of MetS components and CKD was based on odds ratio estimates using logistic regression.The prevalence of CKD was 5.3% and the prevalence of MetS was 47.13%. The components present in the largest number of individuals in the general population were abdominal obesity, low HDL cholesterol, and high blood pressure. Logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of CKD were 1.95 times higher in individuals with MetS than in those without. An accumulation of 3, 4 or 5 MetS components increased the odds of CKD by 2.96, 3.15 and 5.05 times, respectively. Individuals with MetS were 95% more likely to have CKD than those without MetS. The accumulation of MetS components significantly increased the odds of an individual suffering from CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.