ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using machine learning and blood biomarkers.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward actionable biomarkers in psychiatry: a collaborative roadmap for precision clinical trials. An ACNP position paper.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer’s disease imposes a substantial socioeconomic burden on families and society, while diagnosis at the Mild Cognitive Impairment stage remains critical for effective prevention and management. Current machine learning approaches, however, are predominantly reliant on invasive neuroimaging or cerebrospinal fluid analyses, thereby facing inherent diagnostic limitations. Blood biomarkers provide a minimally invasive alternative, yet their integration with explainable ML frameworks for early detection remains underexplored, particularly in the context of scalable clinical implementation. This study aimed to develop a classification model using blood biomarkers and machine learning to diagnose mild cognitive impairment as an early stage of Alzheimer’s disease.
methodsBlood biomarker data from 119 healthy controls and 672 MCI patients were collected from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. Feature selection was performed using correlation-based and wrapper methods. Seven machine learning algorithms were used to build classification models and compare their performance, followed by constructing a stacking model. SHAP was used for model interpretation.
resultsThe stacking model, combining Adaboost, Xgboost, and random forest with a support vector machine as the meta-model, achieved a sensitivity of 0.94 and an accuracy of 0.93. AgRP had the most significant impact on classification, followed by Eotaxin-3.
conclusionsThis study presents an interpretable machine learning model that precisely identifies MCI using blood biomarkers. By not only demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy but also elucidating the roles of key biomarkers, this work establishes the significant potential of our approach as a scalable and minimally invasive tool for early clinical screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.