Evidence mapPaperPMID 41361728Full record

Trial reportJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026

Ovovid trial: the effect of a probiotic micronutrients supplement on oocyte retrieval and quality in oocyte donors. A double blind, randomized controlled trial.

Silvia Bontá, Sara Maggi, Rocío Rodríguez, Rebeca Jiménez, Ana María Villaquiran, Eva Pla, Rocío Fuentes, Maria Dolores Luque, Jaume Ferrer, Luis Quintero

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05473039 (OvoVid Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05473039 nacompletednot on this map

OvoVid Study: Effect of a Multivitamin Supplement With Probiotic (Seidivid Ferty4®) on Oocyte Retrieval and Quality in Oocyte Donors. Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSEID S.A.Ran2022 to 2024Enrolled196ConditionsReproductive Techniques, AssistedArmsSeidivid Ferty4, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Silvia BontáNextFertility Valencia, Av. de Burjassot, 1, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
Sara MaggiNextFertility Valencia, Av. de Burjassot, 1, 46009, Valencia, Spain. sara.maggi923@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2016-0582
Rocío RodríguezNextFertility Sevilla, Av. de Reino Unido, 1, 41012, Seville, Spain.
Rebeca JiménezNextFertility Murcia, Av. Europa, 11, 30007, Murcia, Spain.
Ana María VillaquiranNextFertility Murcia, Av. Europa, 11, 30007, Murcia, Spain.
Eva PlaNextFertility Valencia, Av. de Burjassot, 1, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
Rocío FuentesNextFertility Sevilla, Av. de Reino Unido, 1, 41012, Seville, Spain.
Maria Dolores LuqueNextFertility Murcia, Av. Europa, 11, 30007, Murcia, Spain.
Jaume FerrerNextFertility Valencia, Av. de Burjassot, 1, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
Luis QuinteroNextFertility Valencia, Av. de Burjassot, 1, 46009, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate whether a micronutrients supplement combined with probiotics improves oocyte retrieval outcomes in normoresponder women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for oocyte donation.

methodsA multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted between July 2022 and July 2024 with 196 normoresponder oocyte donors at three fertility centers in Spain. Participants received either study supplement or a placebo for at least 30 days before and during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

resultsThe intention-to-treat analysis showed a significant increase in the total number of follicles (28.01 ± 10.4 vs. 24.7 ± 7.1; p = 0.0314) and follicles ≥ 16 mm (19.3 ± 8.6 vs. 15.8 ± 6.1; p = 0.0065) in the study group compared to the placebo group. Regarding the quality of MII oocytes, the mean number of good-quality oocytes showed no differences between groups (17.0 ± 7.7 (84.1%) vs. 15.4 ± 8.2 (81.4%); p = 0.2187). The per-protocol analysis (participants who completed the study and adhered fully to the supplement regimen, n = 79) revealed significantly higher total oocytes retrieved (27.7 ± 10.4 vs. 21.2 ± 7.9; p = 0.0045), MII oocytes (22.5 ± 8.89 vs. 17.3 ± 7.25; p = 0.0092), and good-quality MII oocytes (18.97 ± 7.7 vs. 13.42 ± 6.5; p = 0.0019) in the study group.

conclusionsProbiotic micronutrients supplementation improved follicular development and oocyte yield, in normoresponder oocyte donors, especially when administered according to the recommended protocol. These findings suggest potential benefits for oocyte donation programs; however, further research is needed to establish definitive recommendations. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (TRN: NCT05473039) on June 27, 2022.

Indexed as

MicronutrientsOocyte DonationOocyte RetrievalOocytesProbioticsAdultDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansOvarian FollicleOvulation InductionPregnancyTissue DonorsMicronutrientsMicronutrients supplementOocyte donorsOocyte yieldOvarian stimulationProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID41361728
PMCPMC12901765

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.