Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361762›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025

How social pharmaceutical innovations are addressing problems of availability, accessibility and affordability of drugs for rare diseases.

Conor M W Douglas, Tineke Kleinhout-Vliek, Rob Hagendijk, Vololona Rabeharisoa, Wouter Boon, Fernando Aith, Claudio Cordovil Oliveira, Shir Grunebaum, Ellen Moors

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Conor M W DouglasDepartment Science, Technology & Society, 307 Bethune College, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada. cd512@yorku.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-9989
Tineke Kleinhout-VliekSchool of Business, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Rob HagendijkFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Spui 2, Amsterdam, 1012 WX, The Netherlands.
Vololona RabeharisoaSociology at the Mines ParisTech at the Université PSL, 60 Boulevard Saint Michel, Paris 75272 CEDEX 06, Paris, France.
Wouter BoonInnovation and Sustainability Institute at Universiteit Utrecht, Princetonlaan 8a, Utrecht, 3584 CB, The Netherlands.
Fernando AithHealth Law at the University of São Paulo Public Health School and Health Law Research Center of the University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudio Cordovil OliveiraPublic Health at the Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz (ENSP/Fiocruz) National School of Public Health, Av. Brazil, 4365 - Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Shir GrunebaumOxford Brookes University and Paediatric Occupational Therapist at North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, Sterling Way, London, N18 1QX, UK.
Ellen MoorsInnovation and Sustainability Institute at Universiteit Utrecht, Princetonlaan 8a, Utrecht, 3584 CB, The Netherlands.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-19-ISOC-0001-03Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 19/02519-0Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council 2002-2019-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current organization of the pharmaceutical innovation system poses three major challenges for rare disease patients in terms of availability, accessibility and affordability of treatments. While some changes have emerged in the European Union to address some of these challenges, their impacts are not experienced uniformly across member states nor around the world. We have observed niche initiatives that are actively working to address those challenges within their local contexts. In a position paper in this journal, we characterized such initiatives as “social pharmaceutical innovation” (or SPIN): novel collaborations involving diverse sets of actors that break with conventional pharmaceutical innovation practices to develop interventions that address unmet societal needs of rare disease patients and that are not primarily market driven.

resultsHere we report on 15 cases of SPIN across Brazil, Canada, France and the Netherlands that we studied through semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 151) with players involved in those cases. Our findings show how SPIN initiatives are reconfiguring pharmaceutical innovation networks to include a wider range of actors in redistributed and differentiated roles within innovation processes. Further, we find that SPINs are associated with changes in the ways data is gathered (often in clinical contexts rather than in conventional trials), and how evidence is assembled to improve access to the treatments. Finally, we demonstrate how SPINs are providing new routes for patients to access treatments for rare diseases, often at more affordable prices.

conclusionsWhile promising, SPINs are not perfect solutions for rare disease patients or the broader challenges to the pharmaceutical innovation system. SPINs are specific solutions adapted to the particulars of local framing, institutions, national policy and care contexts of rare diseases, and should be developed as such. Our findings support these recommendations for SPIN: use local knowledge and expertise in crafting SPINs; develop comprehensive strategies for data governance, access and ownership; and explore new economic models to recoup investments and/or sustain future initiatives. We invite collaboration on these topics and emerging SPIN initiatives so as to support efforts at addressing challenges of availability, accessibility and affordability of treatments for rare diseases patients.

Indexed as

Orphan Drug ProductionRare DiseasesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNetherlandsOrphan drugsPatient organisationsPolicyRare diseasesSocial innovationSocial pharmaceutical innovationTherapeutic research and development

Identifiers

PMID41361762
PMCPMC12683803

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.