Evidence mapPaperPMID 41361824Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Can TElemedicine system replace doctor consultations to Achieve non-inferior blood pressure in patients with Controlled Hypertension (TEACH)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Sze Nok Ng, Benjamin Hon-Kei Yip, Shuqi Wang, Maria Leung, Shirley Yue Kwan Choi, Shuk-Yun Leung, Jessica Jinghao Han, Wendy Wing-Sze Tsui, Sum Yin Lai, Linda Chan and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06524180 (Can TElemedicine System Replace Doctor Consultations to Achieve Non-inferior Blood Pressure in Patients With Controlled Hypertension), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06524180 narecruitingnot on this map

Can TElemedicine System Replace Doctor Consultations to Achieve Non-inferior Blood Pressure in Patients With Controlled Hypertension (TEACH)? a Randomised Controlled Trial and Cost-minimization Analysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2024 to 2027Enrolled364ConditionsHypertensionArmsTelemedicine, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sze Nok NgThe Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Benjamin Hon-Kei YipThe Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Shuqi WangThe Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Maria LeungDepartment of Family Medicine, New Territory East Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Shirley Yue Kwan ChoiDepartment of Family Medicine, New Territory East Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Shuk-Yun LeungDepartment of Family Medicine, New Territory East Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jessica Jinghao HanDepartment of Family Medicine, New Territory East Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wendy Wing-Sze TsuiFamily Medicine & Primary Healthcare, Queen Mary Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sum Yin LaiDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Linda ChanDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Anastasia S MihailidouDepartment of Cardiology and Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Richard J McManusBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Jimmy SyDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Eric Kam-Pui LeeThe Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. lkp032@cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

Health Bureau 21220241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is the most prevalent chronic condition and is the leading cause of cardiovascular diseases, imposing enormous burdens on the healthcare system. Although telemedicine may provide improved blood pressure (BP) monitoring and control, it remains unclear whether it could replace face-to-face consultations for patients with optimal BP control. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to investigate whether participants assigned to the telemedicine group show non-inferior BP control compared to the usual care group at 12 months.

methodsThis randomised controlled trial (RCT) will involve 364 patients receiving anti-HT medications who have well-controlled BP on out-of-office BP measurements, including HBPM or ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM). Participants will be randomised to either the telemedicine (HealthCap) group or usual care (control) group (1:1). Patients in the intervention group will measure and transmit their 7-day home BP measurements (HBPM) to the physician's office. The medications will be refilled without consultation when optimal control (<135/85 mmHg for patients without comorbidities and <130/80 mmHg for patients with comorbidities that increase cardiovascular risk) and safety questions are confirmed. Nevertheless, if any of the answers in the safety questions are positive or the HBPM mean is suboptimal, patients will have consultations as planned. Investigators will be blinded to the randomisation sequence and allocation. The primary outcome is the daytime ABPM systolic BP at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include HT treatment adherence, self-efficacy, number of visits to primary care clinics where they have clinical follow-up, health care utilisation other than general outpatient clinics (GOPCs) in both arms at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Acceptability will be assessed through interviews with the telemedicine study participants and the physician. DISCUSSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: This trial will examine whether patients in the telemedicine group would have non-inferior BP control compared to patients in the usual care group. It has the potential to change clinical practice and have important research implications because patients with optimal BP can monitor their BP through a telemedicine system and will have fewer frequent clinical visits. This will empower primary care and allow effective and safe allocation of scarce medical resources to patients in need. Moreover, it will save patients time because of the long wait to see doctors and collect medications in GOPCs. It is also encouraging the engagement of patients in their health because they will play a proactive role in managing their chronic illnesses.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06524180. Registered on July 29, 2024. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06524180?term=NCT06524180&rank=1#more-information .

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHypertensionReferral and ConsultationTelemedicineBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansOffice VisitsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsBlood pressureChineseHypertensionMobile appRandomised controlled trialTEACHTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41361824
PMCPMC12797787

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.