ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
Federated generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Centile curves of refraction in children and adolescents aged 5-18 in Hubei Province: a study based on GAMLSS to predict refraction development.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Federated analytics for non-communicable disease surveillance in the European health data space: a scoping review and conceptual framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe generalized additive model for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) is a flexible regression model with a wide range of applications. In particular, it is the standard method to estimate age-specific percentile curves for clinical parameters for children and adolescents. Deriving international percentile curves requires large datasets that cover a diverse population. Such datasets are typically obtained by pooling data from multiple studies. However, due to ethical and legal constraints, physically sharing and pooling sensitive individual-level data might not always be permitted. Therefore, we aimed to develop a privacy-enhancing method to fit a GAMLSS.
methodsWe developed a federated version of the GAMLSS algorithm which allows to co-analyze data from different sources, without physically transferring the data. Instead, data are analyzed locally within their secure home environments and only non-disclosive analysis results are shared. We implemented our method in DataSHIELD, an open-source software infrastructure for federated analysis in R, and investigated its theoretical properties. Considering two different use cases, we applied our algorithm to physically separated epidemiological study data and compared its results with the ones obtained by fitting a GAMLSS to the physically-pooled data. Furthermore, we evaluated the runtime of the federated GAMLSS against the original GAMLSS algorithm for varying number of observations and DataSHIELD servers.
resultsWe proved that, in theory, the federated GAMLSS yields identical results as the original GAMLSS algorithm, using the additivity of matrix multiplication in the fitting algorithm. Furthermore, we provided an implementation of the proposed algorithm and demonstrated that the federated GAMLSS implementation yielded the same results as the pooled GAMLSS in our examples, with only minor differences attributable to numerical computation. However, the runtime was more than 1000 times higher for fitting the federated compared to the pooled GAMLSS.
conclusionsIn this paper, we propose a privacy-enhancing federated GAMLSS that yields virtually identical results as the original GAMLSS algorithm, without the need to physically pool the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.