Evidence mapPaperPMID 41361871Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Mental health and body mass index in early pregnancy: a secondary analysis of three randomised controlled trials.

Nina Kornerup, Megan Mitchell, Louise G Grunnet, Tina Vilsbøll, Signe S Torekov, Aline Kunnel, Andrea R Deussen, Jodie M Dodd

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nina KornerupClinical and Translational Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4882-6835
Megan MitchellDiscipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4284-2201
Louise G GrunnetClinical and Translational Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-2597
Tina VilsbøllClinical and Translational Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-6787
Signe S TorekovDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6779-0252
Aline KunnelBiostatistics Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Andrea R DeussenDiscipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6210-1876
Jodie M DoddDiscipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. jodie.dodd@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-4874

Funding

NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship ID 1196133Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF21OC0068795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOverweight and obesity in pregnant women have been associated with an increased risk of depression and anxiety, but the strength of these associations and the influence of confounders remain uncertain. Understanding these associations may help identify women at risk in early pregnancy and guide targeted support. This study aimed to quantify associations between maternal body mass index (BMI) and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in early pregnancy and to assess whether they persisted after adjustment for confounders.

methodsThis secondary analysis pooled baseline data from three randomised controlled trials including women at gestational week 10 + 0 to 20 + 0: LIMIT (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m²), GRoW (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m²) and OPTIMISE (BMI ≥ 18.5 to ≤ 24.9 kg/m²). LIMIT and OPTIMISE randomised participants to lifestyle intervention or standard care. In GRoW all women received a lifestyle intervention and were randomised to metformin or placebo. At baseline, women completed questionnaires assessing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and HRQoL (SF-12 or SF-36).

results2961 pregnant women (mean BMI: 29.3 kg/m

conclusionIncreasing BMI was associated with higher depressive symptoms and poorer physical HRQoL in early pregnancy, but effect sizes were small, inconsistent, and attenuated after adjustment, suggesting modest associations partly explained by confounding. These findings highlight the need for a holistic approach to supporting mental health in pregnant women with overweight or obesity, as multiple factors beyond body weight likely contribute.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; LIMIT (ACTRN12607000161426, 9 March 2007); OPTIMISE (ACTRN12614000583640, 30 May 2014); GRoW (ACTRN12612001277831, 10 December 2012).

Indexed as

AnxietyBody Mass IndexDepressionMental HealthObesityOverweightPregnancy ComplicationsQuality of LifeAdultFemaleHumansLife StyleMetforminPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMetforminAnxietyDepressionMental disordersObesityOverweightPregnancyQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID41361871
PMCPMC12798114

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.