Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361920›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

Disentangling Responsibility: Perspectives on Dementia Prevention From Stakeholders in Canada, Germany and Switzerland.

Niklas Petersen, Mattia Andreoletti, Alessandro Blasimme, Cynthia Lazzaroni, Annette Leibing, Silke Schicktanz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niklas PetersenDepartment of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2540-113X
Mattia AndreolettiDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1880-0770
Alessandro BlasimmeDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5908-2002
Cynthia LazzaroniDepartment of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-3616-9413
Annette LeibingFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2658-3497
Silke SchicktanzDepartment of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9627-752X

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GP2120CIHR ERN 174187ERA-Net NEURON 026Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé 295645Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung SNSF 10NE17_199434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia prevention has become a priority in medical research and public health. Various medical, social and environmental risk factors have been identified; however, medical studies, media discourses and health policies predominantly centre on individual-level prevention and promote personal responsibility for maintaining cognitive health. This emphasis on individual preventive efforts faces increasing criticism for being ethically problematic, medically insufficient and reflective of a neoliberal responsibilisation of (cognitive) ageing. Our study, based on 60 semi-structured qualitative interviews with stakeholders involved in dementia research, care and health policy from Canada, Germany and Switzerland, situates the preventive turn within contemporary ageing cultures and welfare policies. By examining the epistemic and normative arguments underlying current debates on dementia prevention, we illustrate how stakeholders justify both personal and governmental responsibilities in preventing dementia. Although managing and mitigating various risk factors throughout life is often framed as a matter of personal responsibility, many stakeholders advocate combining individual-level prevention with population-level efforts to address social inequalities that affect the risk of developing dementia. Drawing on the interview study, we highlight the importance of recognising the political and normative foundations and implications of dementia prevention strategies.

Indexed as

DementiaHealth PolicySocial ResponsibilityStakeholder ParticipationCanadaFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsSwitzerlanddementiahealth policyhealth promotionpreventionresponsibility

Identifiers

PMID41361920
PMCPMC12686603

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.