ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025
Strong living scaffolds for load-bearing musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 3D-printed scaffold-based strategies for enthesis regeneration: a systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- A designable twist-densification route to bioactive collagen hydrogel yarns approaching tendon-like mechanics.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- MSC-Hydrogel Composite Systems for Knee Cartilage Repair and Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) Repair With vs Without Bio-inductive Scaffold Augmentation for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and Protein-Based Hydrogels: Novel Approaches for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sports Injuries.Polymers · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Chitosan/Polyvinyl Alcohol-Glycerol Scaffolds Inspired by Porcupine Quills for Segmental Bone Defect Repair.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Design and Validation of a Multi-Modal Bioreactor System: Assessing the Effects of Perfusion and Cyclic Tensile Stimulation on Mechanical and Biological Properties of 3D-Printed Missing-Rib Auxetic Scaffolds.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Scaffolds and Extracellular Matrix-Based Strategies for Myofiber Regeneration in Volumetric Muscle Loss.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Load-bearing musculoskeletal tissues, including bone, cartilage, tendon, ligament, and skeletal muscle, possess highly specialized biological and biomechanical properties that enable weight support, movement, and protection of vital organs. However, intrinsic limitations in self-healing and exposure to complex physiological forces render them particularly vulnerable to injury and degeneration, resulting in musculoskeletal disorders with significant global impact. Current clinical solutions, ranging from bioinert metallic or polymeric implants to bioinductive, biodegradable scaffolds, provide temporary mechanical stabilization or promote tissue remodeling, yet often fail to achieve simultaneous mechanical robustness and biological functionality. To overcome these limitations, regenerative scaffolds incorporating living cells have emerged as a new paradigm. Nevertheless, conventional cell-laden hydrogels suffer from inadequate load-bearing capacity, whereas polymer scaffolds, although mechanically robust, lack the biological microenvironment to support functional regeneration. Recent research has therefore focused on developing strong living scaffolds that integrate toughness and cytocompatibility through two main approaches: mechanical reinforcement of cell-laden hydrogels and design of polymer-hydrogel hybrid scaffolds. This review summarizes the biology and biomechanics of load-bearing musculoskeletal tissues, evaluates clinically established bioinert and bioinductive implants, and highlights advanced approaches for engineering strong living scaffolds that combine robust mechanical strength with biological activity. Finally, we discuss future challenges and opportunities toward the clinical translation of next generation regenerative biomaterials for musculoskeletal tissue repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.