Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362457›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025

Strong living scaffolds for load-bearing musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.

Ni Chen, Menglu Wu, Reyla Williams, Jianfeng Yan, Jiayi Zhou, Donghui Zhu, Yonghui Ding

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ni ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 01609, USA.
Menglu WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11790, USA.
Reyla WilliamsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 01609, USA.
Jianfeng YanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 01609, USA.
Jiayi ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11790, USA.
Donghui ZhuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11790, USA.
Yonghui DingDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 01609, USA.

Funding

3D Bioprinting of Strong Living ScaffoldsR21EB032535 · NIBIB · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI DING, YONGHUI · 2022 to 2025
$668k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB032535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Load-bearing musculoskeletal tissues, including bone, cartilage, tendon, ligament, and skeletal muscle, possess highly specialized biological and biomechanical properties that enable weight support, movement, and protection of vital organs. However, intrinsic limitations in self-healing and exposure to complex physiological forces render them particularly vulnerable to injury and degeneration, resulting in musculoskeletal disorders with significant global impact. Current clinical solutions, ranging from bioinert metallic or polymeric implants to bioinductive, biodegradable scaffolds, provide temporary mechanical stabilization or promote tissue remodeling, yet often fail to achieve simultaneous mechanical robustness and biological functionality. To overcome these limitations, regenerative scaffolds incorporating living cells have emerged as a new paradigm. Nevertheless, conventional cell-laden hydrogels suffer from inadequate load-bearing capacity, whereas polymer scaffolds, although mechanically robust, lack the biological microenvironment to support functional regeneration. Recent research has therefore focused on developing strong living scaffolds that integrate toughness and cytocompatibility through two main approaches: mechanical reinforcement of cell-laden hydrogels and design of polymer-hydrogel hybrid scaffolds. This review summarizes the biology and biomechanics of load-bearing musculoskeletal tissues, evaluates clinically established bioinert and bioinductive implants, and highlights advanced approaches for engineering strong living scaffolds that combine robust mechanical strength with biological activity. Finally, we discuss future challenges and opportunities toward the clinical translation of next generation regenerative biomaterials for musculoskeletal tissue repair.

Indexed as

Biomaterial scaffoldsCell-laden hydrogelsLoad-bearing musculoskeletal tissuesMechanical reinforcementRegenerative scaffoldsTissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID41362457
PMCPMC12681846

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.