Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362505›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Prescribing Patterns and Adverse Reactions of Antipsychotics in a North Indian Psychiatry Outpatient Department.

Shivani Sodhi, Himanshu Singh, Amit Kumar Sharma, Shaily Mina, Sparsh Gupta, Nidhi P Vadanere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shivani SodhiDepartment of Pharmacology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Smt. Sucheta Kriplani (SSK) and Kalawati Saran Children (KSC) Hospitals, New Delhi, IND.
Himanshu SinghDepartment of Pharmacology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Amit Kumar SharmaDepartment of Pharmacology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Shaily MinaDepartment of Psychiatry, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Sparsh GuptaDepartment of Pharmacology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Nidhi P VadanereDepartment of Community Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Smt. Sucheta Kriplani (SSK) and Kalawati Saran Children (KSC) Hospitals, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacovigilance research in India remains at an infantile phase, especially in the pattern of prescription of antipsychotics at the tertiary care level. Given the clinical value of antipsychotic drugs, research on their utilization, trends of prescription, and frequent adverse events associated with them will help to reduce adverse drug events. The proposed study is thus intended to discuss the prescription pattern and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of antipsychotic drugs in the Psychiatric Outpatient unit in Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, one of the tertiary care hospitals in North India.

methodsIn this cross-sectional investigation, systematic random sampling with a fixed sampling interval was used, wherein every third patient attending the Psychiatry Outpatient Department during the study period was selected until the desired sample size of 150 participants (aged 18-65 years) was achieved. The following statistics were collected: medication history, antipsychotic prescriptions, adverse drug events, diagnosis (according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria and definition), and sociodemographics. The information gathered was utilized to ascertain treatment compliance, antipsychotic combinations, and prescription trends as reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Drug Prescribing Indicators.

resultsSixty-nine (46.3%) patients in this research received antipsychotic medications under generic names, while 13 (8.7%) received several antipsychotic medications. With a mean ± SD of 2.69 ± 0.84 medications per encounter and 1.13 ± 0.32 antipsychotics per patient, the prescribing trend indicated limited polypharmacy. The most widely used antipsychotics were risperidone in 63 (42%) patients, primarily prescribed for schizophrenia and psychosis not otherwise specified (NOS), followed by olanzapine in 41 (27.3%), commonly used in bipolar affective disorder and schizophrenia. There was a total of 150 study participants, among whom 42 adverse reactions were recorded. The most common ADR was akathisia in nine (21.4%), followed by tremors in six (14.3%) and drowsiness in six (14.3%). According to the WHO/Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC) causality assessment approach, over 90.5% of adverse drug responses could be identified as potential ADRs, and roughly 9.5% were likely ADRs.

conclusionIt is necessary to justify the antipsychotic drug prescribing pattern. By evaluating prescription habits, one may determine the incidence of pharmacovigilance and polytherapy, which helps to minimize and avoid adverse medication responses.

Indexed as

antipsychoticsdrug utilizationpharmacovigilancepolypharmacyprescription patternsschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID41362505
PMCPMC12681964

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.