Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41362547›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Vitamin B12: A Comprehensive Review of Natural vs Synthetic Forms of Consumption and Supplementation.

Christopher R Behringer, Amulya Kulkarni, Alisha Weinstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher R BehringerClinical Education, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, USA.
Amulya KulkarniNeurology, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, USA.
Alisha WeinsteinFamily Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin B12, also known as cyanocobalamin, methylcobalamin, and adenosylcobalamin, is an essential vitamin that can be primarily obtained through the human diet. Although animal-based foods supply adequate B12 for most people, deficiency remains common in older adults, vegetarians and vegans, and in those with gastrointestinal disease or malabsorption. Deficiency can lead to megaloblastic anemia, neurologic symptoms, and pregnancy complications. In healthy individuals, supplementation raises serum B12 levels to a similar extent as dietary intake; however, in disease states such as megaloblastic anemia, supplementation is required because diet alone is not sufficient. Interest has grown in how natural dietary forms, such as methylcobalamin, compare with the widely used synthetic form, cyanocobalamin, with respect to absorption, metabolism, and clinical effect. This comprehensive review summarizes B12 physiology, sources, absorption, and the clinical picture of deficiency, and compares natural and synthetic forms in common patient scenarios. We also note practical questions for future work, including long-term outcomes of supplementation and whether prophylaxis is useful in high-risk groups.

Indexed as

natural vs syntheticsupplementvitamin b 12vitamin deficiencyvit b12 deficiency

Identifiers

PMID41362547
PMCPMC12681447

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.