ReviewGenes & diseases2026
Mechanotransduction and musculoskeletal regeneration: Molecular mechanisms and interdisciplinary applications.
Review in Genes & diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote periosteal distraction promotes ischemic diabetic foot wound repair associated with VEGF/VEGFR2-related angiogenic responses.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Integrated bioinformatic and experimental analyses identify Lumican as a key regulator of LIPUS-induced osteogenesis through Integrin β1/FAK/ERK signaling.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Venous Nanoflap Oscillations: Biomechanical Determinants and Hydrodynamic Consequences in the Deep Cerebral Venous System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Application of axial load-share ratio testing technology in the bone transport treatment of large segmental tibial bone defects.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Neural Orchestration of Mandibular Development.International dental journal · 2026Review
- Advanced materials and devices strategies of mechanical stimulation for tissue regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distraction osteogenesis, or the Illizarov technique, induces bone regeneration using distractive mechanical forces. Nevertheless, Wolff's law holds that bone adapts to reverse compressive mechanical loads, growing denser in areas of high pressure and resorbing in zones of low pressure. These two forms of new bone formation together suggest that mechanical stimuli play an important role in bone remodeling and regeneration. The therapeutic efficacy of distraction osteogenesis has been recognized in orthopedics and maxillofacial surgeries. Distraction osteogenesis was even used for the regeneration of various other tissues/organs, such as blood vessels and skin (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.