Evidence mapPaperPMID 41362780Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Empathy mapping and hybrid persona creation: Understanding older adults' needs in technology design for ageing in place.

Andrea Kastl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrea KastlRosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Technology yields the potential to support independence in later life and facilitate ageing in place. Barriers such as limited usability, varying levels of digital literacy, and persistent age-related stereotypes are documented to hinder technology adoption among older adults. User-centered design approaches, such as the persona method, offer strategies to address these challenges. Objective: Personas were created to inform the development of technologies supporting ageing in place by enhancing stakeholders' understanding of needs and technology experience among older adults. Methods: The personas were developed through an iterative process, with this paper detailing the last stage, which employed the a PATHY technique as conceptual framework for content analysis. Eleven focus group discussions were conducted in southern Germany, of which nine were included in the analysis. These involved older adults in need of support, with orthopedic and neurological conditions, and in informal caregiving roles. Results: Five hybrid personas were created to represent the target groups' experiences related to ageing in place, each reflecting needs, problems, existing solutions, habits, sociodemographic characteristics, and dimensions of technology experience. Key factors influencing technology experience and uptake among the personas were identified, including the social context and availability of support, the perceived trade-off between safety and digital privacy, and the persistence of the digital divide. Conclusion: The findings underscore the necessity of adaptable, context-sensitive technology solutions, displayed by the personas' needs, pains, routines and technology experiences. Thereby, the hybrid personas reinforce the importance of a more relational and context-aware approach in user-centered design.

Indexed as

Ageing in placeAIDigital divideEmpathy mappingOlder adultsPersonaSmart medical devices

Identifiers

PMID41362780
PMCPMC12682221

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.