ReviewNeurourology and urodynamics2026
Phenotyping Overactive Bladder-Part 1: Are There Different Types of Urgency and Can They be Translated to Clinical, Urodynamic and Radiological Phenotyping? ICI-RS 2025.
Review in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOveractive bladder (OAB) is defined as urinary urgency, usually accompanied by increased daytime frequency and/or nocturia, with urgency urinary incontinence (OAB-wet) or without (OAB-dry), in the absence of urinary tract infection or other detectable disease. The key symptom of OAB, urinary urgency, is defined as a complaint of sudden, compelling desire to pass urine which is difficult to defer. However, patients report a range of individual experiences and sensations associated with urgency and studies have identified different types of urgency. Patients with OAB not only differ in clinical presentation, but also have different urodynamic and radiological findings. These variations may explain why OAB treatments work well for some individuals but not others. This paper investigates how knowledge can be advanced by phenotyping OAB by urgency symptom variation, and clinical, urodynamic measurements and radiological features.
methodsA Think Tank at the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society (ICI-RS) 2025 discussed the question, "Can OAB management be improved by phenotyping if there are different types of urgency?" The group discussed the current literature on this topic and developed a list of research questions to help shape the future of the field.
resultsClinical, urodynamic and radiological phenotyping of urgency were discussed and research studies to phenotype urgency were proposed.
conclusionFurther research to phenotype OAB beyond the presence or absence of urgency and urgency urinary incontinence, using clinical, urodynamic measurements and radiological features, is needed. High priority research questions and strategies were defined. Advanced OAB phenotyping may guide tailored management beyond a stepwise approach, with the aim to improve therapeutic outcomes. This would validate phenotyping and is explored in Part 2 of the topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.