ReviewEuropean surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes2026
Desensitization Strategies in Immunized Heart Transplant Recipients.
Review in European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2026
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAllosensitization, defined as the presence of anti-HLA antibodies before transplantation, prolongs the waiting list time and increases the waiting list mortality in patients awaiting heart transplantation. Treatment protocols have been developed to reduce the load of preformed anti-HLA antibodies (pfDSAs), defined as desensitization, and allow safe transplantation across the anti-HLA antibody barrier. Aim of this review was to give an overview on the actual desensitization strategies in heart transplantation. SUMMARY: Desensitization can be performed before transplantation or at the time of transplantation when a donor offer becomes available. Treatment protocols should include drugs and interventions that clear pfDSA, target antibody production, and mitigate antibody-mediated graft damage. By now, several transplant centers have developed their own protocols, with optimal graft survival, freedom from antibody-mediated rejection and from coronary allograft vasculopathy, without any significant adverse events. The evolution of the immunoassays for pfDSA detection has allowed a better precision in pfDSA characterization, such as measurement of titer and complement-binding capacity. These refinements have permitted crossing acceptable pfDSA without any need of desensitization. KEY MESSAGES: Crossing the HLA barrier is feasible and safe in heart transplantation. The complexity and redundancy of the immune pathways requires the identification of the appropriate therapy for each patient. Desensitization protocols should include more than one drug and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.