ArticleGigaScience2026
An integrative multiomics random forest framework for robust biomarker discovery.
Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multivariate Random Forests for Cross-Modal Multi-Omics Integration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Fatty acids, polyphenols and volatiles as predictive biomarkers of cold-pressed oil stability.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh-throughput technologies now produce a wide array of omics data, from genomic and transcriptomic profiles to epigenomic and proteomic measurements. Integrating multiple omics layers measured on the same samples can reveal cross-layer molecular hubs that single-layer analyses miss. However, many existing integrative methods rely on linear assumptions or univariate feature importance, limiting their ability to capture nonlinear and interaction-driven dependencies across data modalities.
resultsWe present an unsupervised, multivariate random forest (MRF) framework with an inverse minimal depth (IMD) importance to prioritize shared biomarkers across omics. In each forest, one layer serves as a multivariate response and the other as predictors; IMD summarizes how early a predictor (or response maximal splitting response variable) appears across trees, yielding interpretable, cross-layer feature rankings. We provide two IMD-based selection strategies and introduce an optional IMD power transform to enhance sensitivity to interaction signals. In extensive simulations spanning linear, nonlinear, and interaction regimes, our method matches sparse partial least squares/canonical correlation analysis under linear settings and outperforms them as nonlinearity increases, while adapted univariate ensemble learners (random forest, gradient boosting machine, XGBoost) underperform in the multivariate, unsupervised context. Applied to breast invasive carcinoma and colon adenocarcinoma in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), MRF-IMD identifies genes, CpGs, and microRNAs enriched for cancer-relevant pathways and yields more robust survival stratification than linear integrators with matched model sizes. In a TCGA pan-cancer analysis, MRF-IMD features achieve a higher Adjusted Rand Index than alternatives and recover coherent tumor-type clusters; in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), the integrative signature improves dementia progression stratification over a published methylation risk score.
conclusionsMRF-IMD provides a scalable and interpretable framework for multiomics integration that reliably identifies cross-layer biomarkers when nonlinear and interaction-driven dependencies are present. This approach advances robust biomarker discovery beyond the limits of linear integrative methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.