Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41364155›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Citizen eyes on elusive wildlife: Assessing public appreciation for urban wild mammals.

Emiliano Mori, Valentina Marchi, Olivia Dondina, Andrea Viviano, Pietro Di Bari, Rosario Balestrieri, Marida Corradetti, Leonardo Ancillotto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Eurasian Red Squirrels (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emiliano Mori *Research Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8108-7950
Valentina Marchi *National Research Council of Italy - Institute of BioEconomy (CNR-IBE), Via G. Caproni 8, 50145, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0329-0707
Olivia DondinaNational Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Piazza Marina 61, 90133, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-1971
Andrea VivianoResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy. andreaviviano@cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2970-3389
Pietro Di BariResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5817-858X
Rosario BalestrieriDepartment of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, CRIMAC, Calabria Marine Centre, Contrada Torre Spaccata, Amendolara, Cosenza, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7245-4368
Marida CorradettiIstituto Istruzione Superiore Agrario Celso Ulpiani, Via Della Repubblica 30, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
Leonardo AncillottoResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8774-0671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanisation is reshaping ecosystems, posing both challenges and opportunities for biodiversity conservation, particularly for urban mammals. We investigated public appreciation of 15 wild mammal species occurring in cities through a visual survey of 1000 respondents across ten Italian cities. Participants ranked species by desirability in urban environments. Hedgehogs, squirrels, rabbits, and roe deer were consistently preferred, possibly for their broad urban presence, whereas rats, wild boar, and coypus were less positively rated, possibly because of the widespread fears of health risks, damage, or invasiveness. Wolves elicited polarised reactions, possibly reflecting complex cultural meanings, including fascination and human-wildlife conflict issues. Geographic variation was marked: some species were preferred where familiar ("familiarity effect"), whereas large carnivores were highly valued where absent ("distance effect"). Visual survey tools effectively captured instinctive responses. Results stress the need for localised, species-specific education and conservation strategies that integrate citizen-science to improve coexistence in urban landscapes.

Indexed as

Animals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesMammalsPublic OpinionAnimalsBiodiversityCitiesCitizen ScienceHumansItalyUrbanizationFamiliarity effectHuman-wildlife coexistenceSocial perceptionUrban ecologyUrban wildlife

Identifiers

PMID41364155
PMCPMC13230373

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.