SynthesisHerz2026
Bleeding risk associated with the co-use of direct oral anticoagulants and non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Herz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral anticoagulation is a cornerstone of stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and elevated thromboembolic risk. However, evidence regarding the association between co-use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) and bleeding risk remains controversial.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials, cohort, and case-control studies evaluating bleeding risk associated with DOAC + CCB co-use in patients with AF. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for binary outcomes.
resultsNine studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 408,276 patients overall, of whom 67,359 were using DOACs + CCBs. Meta-analysis showed a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding with DOAC + CCB co-use compared with DOAC alone (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.18-1.43]; p < 0.001; I
conclusionCo-use of DOACs and non-dihydropyridine CCBs is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding, whereas the overall risk of any bleeding does not differ significantly. Large randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and to further evaluate the safety of this combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41364240What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.