ReviewArchives of microbiology2025
A review of biomaterials mediated probiotics delivery system in the field of inflammatory bowel disease treatment.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in single-cell surface engineering: nano-coating and core-shell strategies for probiotics delivery in inflammatory bowel disease.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is closely related to genetic, environmental, infection and immune factors, making it difficult to cure and resulting in damages to the intestinal mucosal barrier. The current treatment strategies for IBD merely alleviate clinical symptoms, but often fail to repair the intestinal mucosal barrier or interrupt the inflammatory cycle. Moreover, they may lead to the complication like infections and malignancy. Probiotics-based therapies have become the major approach to fight IBD, with the advantages of antagonizing harmful bacteria colonization, repairing intestinal barrier and improving intestinal microenvironment. However, the therapeutic potential of probiotics is limited by their susceptibility to stomach acid, insufficient capacity to eliminate excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the hostile inflammatory microenvironment and the fact that the number of live probiotics colonizing in the intestine is lower than the minimum threshold for beneficial effects. In recent years, the probiotics delivery system constructed with biomaterials can simultaneously achieve targeted release, maintain probiotics activity and improve ROS scavenging ability, thereby disrupting the inflammatory cascade reaction and promoting the recovery of intestinal homeostasis, which bring good news for probiotics in IBD treatment. This study will summarize and review the advantages and disadvantages of various probiotics delivery system constructed based on biomaterials for IBD treatment, and provide insights into future trends in probiotics and their protective strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41364269What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.