ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Digital Health Technologies: Learnings and Perspectives From a Patient Engagement Stakeholder Expectations Matrix Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Real-World Performance Measurement of Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support Tools: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of eHealth interventions on depression, anxiety, quality of life, and post-traumatic stress symptoms among parents of children with cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Review
- Health System- and Payer-Level Decision-Making Processes Influencing the Adoption and Sustainability of Patient-Facing Digital Health Tools: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Outpatients' Readiness for Engagement in Health Information Technology: Implications for Patient Education in University Hospitals of Southern Iran.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Public Health Responsible AI Capability (PH-RAIC) Framework: A Conceptual Model for Integrating AI into Public Health Agencies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital health literacy and associated factors in older adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From product to knowledge: the life cycle of health technologies 2.0 as a framework for health system improvement.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As digital health technologies become increasingly integrated into health care systems worldwide, there is growing recognition that their full potential can be realized only when development is rooted in patient engagement (PE). Despite its proven value in clinical research and health care delivery, PE remains insufficiently embedded in digital health design and implementation. This perspective paper explores the current state of PE in digital health through findings from the Stakeholder Expectations Matrix program developed by Patient Focused Medicines Development. Drawing from 37 in-depth interviews across 6 key stakeholder groups, complemented by insights gathered during a multisession cocreation track at the Patient Engagement Open Forum, this paper highlights differing perspectives on digital health, the barriers to meaningful engagement, and the fragmented nature of data governance and technology adoption. Findings point not only to significant gaps in shared understanding, infrastructure, and policy but also to clear opportunities for collaboration, including early recommendations for building a more inclusive and patient-centered digital health ecosystem, one that supports sustainable innovation, trust, and systemwide impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.