Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41365869›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Unravelling the evolution of wood-feeding in termites with 47 high-resolution genome assemblies.

Cong Liu, Cédric Aumont, Alina A Mikhailova, Tracy Audisio, Simon Hellemans, Yi-Ming Weng, Shulin He, Crystal Clitheroe, Zongqing Wang, Ives Haifig and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Cong Liu *Okinawa Institute of Science & Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-2093
Cédric Aumont *Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3600-9157
Alina A Mikhailova *Department for Materials and the Environment, BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany.
Tracy Audisio *Okinawa Institute of Science & Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan.
Simon HellemansOkinawa Institute of Science & Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1266-9134
Yi-Ming WengOkinawa Institute of Science & Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan.
Shulin HeCollege of Life Sciences, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Crystal ClitheroeOkinawa Institute of Science & Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9795-4377
Zongqing WangCollege of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Ives HaifigUniversidade Federal do ABC, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Santo André, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4749-8945
David Sillam-DussèsUniversity Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratory of Experimental and Comparative Ethology UR4443, 99 avenue Jean-Baptiste Clément, Villetaneuse, France.
Aleš BučekOkinawa Institute of Science & Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan.
Gaku TokudaTropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, 1 Senbaru, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0645-6191
Jan ŠobotníkBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. sobotnik@ftz.czu.cz.
Mark C HarrisonInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1, Münster, Germany. mark.harrison@coventry.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-019X
Dino P McMahonInstitute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. dino-peter.mcmahon@bam.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1119-5299
Thomas BourguignonOkinawa Institute of Science & Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan. Thomas.Bourguignon@oist.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-8977

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) MC 436/5-1; MC 436/7-1; HA 8997/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Termites are a lineage of social cockroaches abundant in tropical ecosystems where they are key decomposers of organic matter. Despite their ecological significance, only a handful of reference-quality termite genomes have been sequenced, which is insufficient to unravel the genetic mechanisms that have contributed to their ecological success. Here, we perform sequencing and hybrid assembly of 45 taxonomically and ecologically diverse termites and two cockroaches, resulting in haplotype-merged genome assemblies of 47 species, 22 of which were near-chromosome level. Next, we examine the link between termite dietary evolution and major genomic events. We find that Termitidae, which include ~80% of described termite species, have larger genomes with more genes and a higher proportion of transposons than other termites. Our analyses identify a gene number expansion early in the evolution of Termitidae, including an expansion of the repertoire of CAZymes, the genes involved in lignocellulose degradation. Notably, this expansion of genomes and gene repertoires coincided with the origin of soil-feeding in Termitidae and remained unchanged in lineages that secondarily reverted to a wood-based diet. Overall, our sequencing effort multiplies the number of available termite genomes by six and provides insights into the genome evolution of an ancient lineage of social insects.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionFeeding BehaviorGenome, InsectIsopteraWoodAnimalsEvolution, MolecularPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID41365869
PMCPMC12708661

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.