ArticleScientific reports2025
Blastulation and ploidy prediction using morphology assessment in 33,999 day-3 embryos.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An Updated Understanding of Human Embryonic Fragmentation.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Pooled it
- Optimizing the Endometrial Factor in Recurrent Implantation Failure: From Established Diagnostics to Mechanism-Informed Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Developmental trajectories from day 2 to day 3 refine ranking and selection of cleavage-stage embryos.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Non-invasive biomarkers in assisted reproductive technologies, current evidence, clinical utility and future perspectives.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although contemporary practice in in vitro fertilization (IVF) favors embryo transfer at blastocyst stage, several centres worldwide employ cleavage-stage Day-3 embryo transfers. The advantage of cultures extended to Day-5 and beyond, is to ensure that the embryo to be transferred will not arrest between Day-3 and Day-5, and that it provides additional morphological quality markers that can be used for selection. To bridge that gap for centres that practice Day-3 transfers, we intended to model the association between Day-3 morphology and blastulation/ploidy tested with modern sequencing technologies, and to develop a validated predictive model for these outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 33,999 Day-3 embryos from 5,702 cycles between March 2017 and December 2021 at ART Fertility center, Abu Dhabi. Day-3 embryos were evaluated for cell number, and degree of fragmentation. Expanded blastocysts with existent inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) cells underwent TE biopsy for PGT-A by next generation sequencing (NGS). The primary objective of the study was to develop prediction models for blastocyst biopsy and euploidy by using Day-3 embryo morphology and patient characteristics. The final models for euploidy and blastulation prediction included Day-3 cell count and fragmentation, and female age. Both models were well-calibrated in validation samples to differentiate blastulation (intercept: 0.087 ± 0.034, slope: 0.827 ± 0.022) and euploidy (intercept: 0.02 ± 0.015, slope: 0.913 ± 0.024) potential of embryos. The machine learning (ML) model obtained higher correct call scores in all performance targets (blastulation, euploidy) when compared to selecting the embryo with highest cell count and lowest fragmentation (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, the developed prediction models ( https://artfertilityclinics.shinyapps.io/GEMMA-D3B/ ) showed its potential in prioritizing Day-3 embryos likely to develop into high-quality and euploid blastocysts. The models can be used by any laboratory set-up without needing specialized equipment or software and is available for further performance validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.