ArticleScientific reports2025
Hypergraph clustering for analyzing chronic disease patterns in mild cognitive impairment reversion and progression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the sequential patterns of chronic conditions that precede the onset of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is essential for understanding both the progression and the potential reversal of MCI. This study identifies common sequences of chronic conditions preceding MCI and introduces a novel, network-based clustering framework for characterizing patients with similar progression patterns linked to cognitive trajectories. We used the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) cohort and categorized participants of MCSA into two groups (i) stay at MCI or progressed to dementia, or (ii) reversion to normal within 5 years after the first onset of MCI. We curate the state transition network (patient level) for identifying and introduced hypergraph clustering (patient group level) to characterize participants with similar sequences. We identified generic key indicators (e.g., chronic kidney disease) and highlighted sex-specific potential indicators (e.g., arthritis, hypertension) associated with MCI reversal, opening new research directions to explore potential differences between males and females. There are certain ssequences of chronic conditions (e.g., originating from arthritis) that are more commonly observed in females. However, these observations warrant further validation. The proposed framework - hypergraph clustering - offers a promising method for uncovering similarities in patients through unique trajectories of chronic conditions that precede MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.