ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
A machine learning-based predictive model for lymph node metastasis in elderly patients with early gastric cancer and prognosis.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic surgery in the 21st century: triumphs, turning points, and unresolved challenges.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Adjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node examination interact to shape survival in older adults (≥ 75 years) with resected gastric cancer: a SEER-based propensity score-matched and competing-risk analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with early-stage gastric cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) plays a key role in the treatment of patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), especially elderly patients (over 65 years old). The accurate preoperative prediction of LNM is still a challenge, and studies of elderly patients are lacking. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an effective model based on machine learning to predict the risk of preoperative LNM in elderly patients with EGC. The data of 1578 patients from 2010 to 2020 were extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Five different machine learning algorithms were applied to construct the models. The external validation data were obtained from 127 elderly patients in our hospital. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the models were compared and evaluated. A Cox regression model was used to determine the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with EGC. Of the 1578 patients included in this study, 165 (10.46%) had LNM. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that differentiation grade, T stage, tumour size were independent predictors of LNM. The performance of the random forest (RF) model was the best, with an AUC of 0.771 in the training cohort, 0.733 in the internal validation cohort and 0.796 in the external test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that sex, age, primary site, tumour size, T stage, radiotherapy and RNE were independent prognostic factors for OS in elderly patients with EGC. Based on RF model, clinicians can develop more reasonable treatment plans to improve the prognosis of patients and reduce the burden on the medical system and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41366195What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.