ArticleBMC primary care2025
Unpacking the value of pharmacists in team-based primary care in British Columbia, Canada: a qualitative evaluation.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safe Handover or Lost in Transition?-A Retrospective Evaluation of Pharmacist Referrals to Primary Care Following Hospital Discharge.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interprofessional team members' experiences collaborating with pharmacists in team-based primary care in British Columbia, Canada: a qualitative evaluation.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pharmacy profession has been continuously evolving, redefining pharmacists' scope of practice within various practice settings to meet the ongoing societal needs, demands and patient expectations. Pharmacists are increasingly becoming part of primary care teams in countries such as Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. In British Columbia, Canada, primary care clinical pharmacists (PCCPs) were incorporated into developing primary care networks (PCNs) over a three-year period. Our project aimed to gain insight into how the role of PCCPs is perceived by their interprofessional team (IPT) members in addition to how the pharmacists themselves view their contribution to team-based primary care.
methodsThis project was conducted as part of the evaluation of the Pharmacists in PCN Program and was informed by Qualitative Description methodology. Data was collected at two time points during program implementation. Participants included program team members, PCCPs and PCN members (administrators, IPT members, and prescribers) who were invited via e-mail to participant in virtual individual interviews and focus groups.
resultsPrescribers and PCN IPT members felt supported when collaborating with PCCPs for the shared care of mutual patients. Additionally, PCCPs believed that team members valued their role. There was a recognized need for PCCPs to be co-located in clinics as efficient, reliable, and accessible team members owing to their role in medication management, offering patient-centred recommendations and follow-up care plans to optimize medication regimens, providing patient education which empowers patients to advocate for their health needs, prioritizing patient autonomy, decreasing the amount of time prescribers and IPT members spend on complex patients, and supporting patients who do not have immediate access to a family physician.
conclusionPerceptions of the PCCP's contribution to IPTs were overwhelmingly positive. The PCCP's specific role in addressing aspects of patient care that other health care providers may overlook, and their possession of knowledge, expertise, and skills which fall outside other team members' scope of work has led to their recognition as an essential team member. However, more research is needed to look beyond the pharmacist's impact on providing longitudinal medication management, as perceived by all members of the primary care team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.