ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025
Incidence of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections before, during, and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a registry-based cohort study.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 30 years in service, 1996-2026: Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic generally was associated with more healthcare-associated infections (HAI) we found fewer central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) during the pandemic as compared to the time period before in patients mainly with haematological malignancies. Since data on post-pandemic HAI are scarce, we conducted an analysis focused on post-pandemic CRBSI. We hypothesised that the CRBSI incidence has increased again after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
methodsFor this cohort study, data were derived from a multicentre real-world registry on routine CVC surveillance in haematology and oncology departments in Germany. CRBSI that occurred after and during the pandemic, respectively, were compared with those before the pandemic. Endpoints were CRBSI incidences and rates.
resultsA total of 1474, 1079, and 692 CVC from the pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic period, respectively, were analysed. CVC were mostly used in patients with haematological malignancies. Compared to the CRBSI incidence of the pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts (3.9 and 1.9/1000 CVC days, respectively; p < 0.001), the CRBSI incidence of the post-pandemic cohort was similar to the incidence of the pre-pandemic cohort (3.3/1000 CVC days; p = 0.43). Likewise, the CRBSI rate declined during the pandemic (6.0% vs. 2.9%; p < 0.001) and increased afterwards to a level comparable to that from the pre-pandemic period (4.8%; p = 0.29). In multivariable analysis, the time periods before and after the pandemic were independent CRBSI risk factors.
conclusionsOur data provide some evidence that following a temporary decline of CRBSI during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, CRBSI now returned to that observed in the pre-pandemic era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.