Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366567›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025

"The ability to get ahead": Australian parent perspectives on genomics in newborn screening and considerations for potential models of care.

Sarah-Grace Paguinto, Christian Meagher, Joanne Scarfe, Kaustuv Bhattacharya, Dinusha Pandithan, Alexis Turner, Jo Watson, Sarah Norris, Michelle A Farrar, Didu S Kariyawasam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah-Grace PaguintoDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Sarahgrace.Paguinto@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5985-3902
Christian MeagherDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3157-3719
Joanne ScarfeFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Leeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics and Data, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3773-4537
Kaustuv BhattacharyaDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0518-5879
Dinusha PandithanGenetic Metabolic Disorders Service, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7927-5418
Alexis TurnerFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Leeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics and Data, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Jo WatsonHTA Consumer Consultative Committee, Office of Health Technology Assessment Branch, Australian Government Department of Health, Disability, and Ageing, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Sarah NorrisFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Leeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics and Data, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4733-6906
Michelle A FarrarDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Didu S KariyawasamDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4176-4010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of genomics in newborn screening is rapidly becoming a reality through accelerated clinical research and investment in genomic sequencing programs. The perspectives of parents who have experienced genetic screening and technologies can inform effective clinical translation and co-design of a model of care for future programs. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 23 parents of children diagnosed with genetic conditions. Data were evaluated using inductive content analysis methods. Parents valued expeditious, contemporary and accurate information from specialists to manage uncertainties and aid decision-making upon receiving a genomic diagnosis, alongside coordination and collaboration with local services to provide child and family centred care. Integration of psychosocial support into genomic NBS programs was highlighted as an important strategy to mitigate potential psychological risks of receiving a newborn genomic screening result. Integrating genomic NBS in current health ecosystems requires a model that provides care and support across the healthcare journey for the child and family. Information provision and consent at screening facilitates familial understanding of the implications of genomic screening. Equitable access to post screening care and expertise is essential to optimise health and psychosocial outcomes for the child and family and maintain parental acceptability.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.